Integrating maintenance work progress monitoring into aircraft maintenance planning decision support

A decision support framework is proposed, allowing for the integration of aircraft maintenance work progress monitoring into the aircraft maintenance planning decision support process. The framework is able to monitor the progression of planned maintenance by analysing real-time data on work progress. This can be used to explore optimal task planning in case of delays or maintenance being ahead of schedule. Using a combination of reliability analysis, cost analysis, decision alternative generation and ranking yields a decision support tool which is able to deal with the stochastic nature of maintenance task execution. Case study results indicate that the framework is able to generate decision alternatives with a lower total cost than the reference alternative, while at the same time optimising the maintenance planning, resulting in a possible reduction of the maintenance costs of 45 to 90% (depending on parameter settings).

[1]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  PROMPT, A Decision Support System for Opportunity-Based Preventive Maintenance , 1996 .

[2]  Khairy A.H. Kobbacy,et al.  Preventive maintenance modelling , 1996 .

[3]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Total productive maintenance: literature review and directions , 2008 .

[4]  Achim Sgaslik Planning German Army Helicopter Maintenance and Mission Assignment , 1994 .

[5]  Rajan Batta,et al.  A branch-and-price approach for operational aircraft maintenance routing , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  On the impact of optimisation models in maintenance decision making: the state of the art , 1998 .

[7]  Süleyman Özekici,et al.  Reliability and Maintenance of Complex Systems , 2010, NATO ASI Series.

[8]  Ali Haghani,et al.  An optimization model for aircraft maintenance scheduling and re-assignment , 2003 .

[9]  Cláudio Márcio N.A. Pereira,et al.  A model for preventive maintenance planning by genetic algorithms based in cost and reliability , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Haritha Saranga Relevant condition‐parameter strategy for an effective condition‐based maintenance , 2002 .

[11]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  Opportunistic maintenance (OM) as a new advancement in maintenance approaches , 2014 .

[12]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  An approach to operational aircraft maintenance planning , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  George Kozanidis,et al.  An exact solution algorithm for maximizing the fleet availability of a unit of aircraft subject to flight and maintenance requirements , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[15]  Colonel Roche,et al.  A dynamic approach for aircraft assignment and maintenance scheduling by airlines , 2000 .

[16]  Andrew J. Cook,et al.  The hidden cost of airline unpunctuality , 2012 .

[17]  Wim J. C. Verhagen,et al.  Maximizing Operational Readiness in Military Aviation by Optimizing Flight and Maintenance Planning , 2015 .

[18]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Marginal cost criteria for preventive replacement of a group of components , 1995 .

[19]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Preventive maintenance at opportunities of restricted duration , 1991 .

[20]  Anthony M. Smith,et al.  Reliability-Centered Maintenance , 1992 .