Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing

This paper revisits empirical and theoretical problems of focus prosody in Japanese, and proposes a new analysis. Contrary to the widely accepted assumption that focus directly or indirectly modifies prosodic phrasing, various studies have shown that prosodic boundaries remain unchanged when a focus is added to a sentence. It is proposed that phonetic effects of focus (F0-rise on the focused word, and reduction in the post-focal areas) result from manipulations of metrical prominences (addition of focal prominence on the focused word and deletion of head prominences in the post-focal area) that have no effect on prosodic boundaries. In order to allow prominence manipulation while keeping prosodic phrasing intact, two modifications are made to one of the widely accepted Optimality-Theoretic analyses of focus prosody. First, the syntax-prosody alignment constraint will be ranked higher, which allows it to dictate the location of prosodic boundaries. Second, metrical culminativity (one metrical prominence per prosodic constituent) is treated as a violable constraint, and it is proposed that this constraint is low-ranked in Japanese. As a result, Japanese allows multi-headed phrases (when focus adds a prominence), as well as headless prosodic phrases (when focus deletes post-focal prominences). (Less)

[1]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Information structure : theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives , 2010 .

[2]  Larry M. Hyman.  Word-prosodic typology , 2006, Phonology.

[3]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[4]  Daniel Büring,et al.  Topic and focus : cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation , 2007 .

[5]  Haruo Kubozono.  Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese , 1989, Phonology.

[6]  Hiroyuki Nagahara,et al.  Phonological phrasing in Japanese , 1994 .

[7]  Elisabeth Selkirk.  The Syntax‐Phonology Interface , 2011 .

[8]  S. Ishihara.  Intonation and interface conditions , 2003 .

[9]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[10]  Carol Georgopoulos,et al.  Interdisciplinary approaches to language : essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda , 1992 .

[11]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Bengali Intonation Revisited: An Optimality Theoretic Analysis in which FOCUS Stress Prominence Drives FOCUS Phrasing , 2008 .

[12]  L. Downing,et al.  Where's the topic in Zulu? , 2009 .

[13]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  The Intonation of Gapping and Coordination in Japanese: Evidence for Intonational Phrase and Utterance , 2008, Phonetica.

[14]  Kikuo Maekawa.  Is there dephrasing' of the accentual phrase in Japanese? , 1994 .

[15]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[16]  Charles B. Chang,et al.  Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2008 .

[17]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[18]  Armin Mester,et al.  9. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese , 2009 .

[19]  Caroline Féry,et al.  How focus and givenness shape prosody , 2009 .

[20]  S. Ishihara.  Major Phrase, Focus Intonation, Multiple Spell-Out (MaP, FI, MSO) , 2007 .

[21]  W. Poser.  The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese , 1990 .

[22]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing , 2000 .

[23]  T. Yoshida,et al.  Question marker drop in Japanese , 1996 .

[24]  Vieri Samek-Lodovici,et al.  Prosody–Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus , 2005 .

[25]  Junko Ito,et al.  Prosodic Adjunction in Japanese Compounds , 2006 .

[26]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[27]  Caroline Vieri Fery,et al.  Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci , 2006 .

[28]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[29]  Merle Horne,et al.  Prosody: Theory and Experiment , 2000 .

[30]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Haruo Kubozono.  The organization of Japanese prosody , 1987 .

[32]  Haruo Kubozono,et al.  Focus and Intonation in Japanese: Does Focus Trigger Pitch Reset? * , 2005 .

[33]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Prosodic Structure of Function Words , 2008 .

[34]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: the syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure (特集 言語構造のインターフェイス) , 2009 .

[35]  No Value.  Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences , 2000 .

[36]  D. Ladd.  Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances , 1988 .

[37]  T. Borowsky.  Prosody matters : essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk , 2012 .

[38]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Syntax and Downstep in Japanese , 1991 .

[39]  Yosuke Igarashi,et al.  Typology of intonational phrasing in Japanese dialects , 2010 .

[40]  James L. Morgan,et al.  Signal to syntax : bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition , 1996 .