The European Association of Urology COVID Intermediate-priority Group is Poorly Predictive of Pathological High Risk Among Patients with Renal Tumours
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Klatte | A. Bex | L. Grant | N. Campain | J. Neves | R. Barod | Y. Abu-Ghanem | F. Mumtaz | M. Tran | S. El-Sheikh | P. Patki | M. Tran-Dang | T. Kuusk | P. Satish
[1] Hiren V. Patel,et al. Delaying surgery for clinical T1b-T2bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: Oncologic implications in the COVID-19 era and beyond , 2020, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.
[2] Nari Shin,et al. Postoperative Biochemical Failure in Patients With PI-RADS Category 4 or 5 Prostate Cancers: Risk Stratification According to Zonal Location of an Index Lesion. , 2020, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3] M. Babjuk,et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era☆ , 2020, European Urology.
[4] Yu Xuan Kitzing,et al. An update of pitfalls in prostate mpMRI: a practical approach through the lens of PI-RADS v. 2 guidelines , 2017, Insights into Imaging.
[5] Yipeng Hu,et al. The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.
[6] M. Parmar,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confi rmatory study , 2018 .
[7] H. Ahmed,et al. Transperineal template prostate‐mapping biopsies: an evaluation of different protocols in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer , 2016, BJU international.
[8] J. Brooks,et al. Biologic differences between peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer , 2015, The Prostate.
[9] M. Roethke,et al. Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for Enhanced Prostate Diagnostics , 2013, BJU international.
[10] Lars Egevad,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[11] John T. Wei. Limitations of a contemporary prostate biopsy: the blind march forward. , 2010, Urologic oncology.
[12] Xavier Leroy,et al. Peripheral zone prostate cancers: Location and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology , 2009, The Prostate.
[13] M. Melamed,et al. Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate--a 4-year experience. , 2007, Urology.
[14] J. Cheville,et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.
[15] T. Stamey,et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1989, The Journal of urology.
[16] T. Klatte,et al. European Association of Urology COVID intermediate prioritisation group is poorly predictive of pathological high- risk among patients with renal tumours , 2021, VIRTUAL ACADEMIC SURGERY CONFERENCE 2021 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS.
[17] C. Compton,et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.
[18] J. McNeal,et al. The zonal anatomy of the prostate , 1981, The Prostate.