The Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Focus on Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion and Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Coronary artery disease is still a major cause of death and morbidity worldwide. In the setting of chronic coronary disease, demonstration of inducible ischemia is mandatory to address treatment. Consequently, scientific and technological efforts were made in response to the request for non-invasive diagnostic tools with better sensitivity and specificity. To date, clinicians have at their disposal a wide range of stress-imaging techniques. Among others, stress cardiac magnetic resonance (S-CMR) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) techniques both demonstrated their diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value in clinical trials when compared to other non-invasive ischemia-assessing techniques and invasive fractional flow reserve measurement techniques. Standardized protocols for both S-CMR and CTP usually imply the administration of vasodilator agents to induce hyperemia and contrast agents to depict perfusion defects. However, both methods have their own limitations, meaning that optimizing their performance still requires a patient-tailored approach. This review focuses on the characteristics, drawbacks, and future perspectives of these two techniques.

[1]  J. Garot,et al.  Prognostic Value of Stress CMR in Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Stenosis on CCTA. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: A Review on Technical Principles and Clinical Applications , 2022, J. Imaging.

[3]  L. Boussel,et al.  Coronary CT Angiography with Photon-counting CT: First-In-Human Results. , 2022, Radiology.

[4]  J. McMurray,et al.  2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure , 2022, European journal of heart failure.

[5]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: JACC Review Topic of the Week. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Dellegrottaglie,et al.  Evidence and Applicability of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Detecting Coronary Artery Disease: State of the Art , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[7]  M. Jerosch-Herold,et al.  What Is the Clinical Impact of Stress CMR After the ISCHEMIA Trial? , 2021, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[8]  G. Pontone,et al.  Stress CMR in Known or Suspected CAD: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role , 2021, BioMed research international.

[9]  D. Pennell,et al.  Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Coronary Microvascular Disease Using Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  D. Pennell,et al.  SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  S. Petersen,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion with qualitative magnetic resonance and quantitative dynamic computed tomography: comparison of diagnostic performance and incremental value over coronary computed tomography angiography. , 2020, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  S. Plein,et al.  Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: feasibility and development of biventricular function and great vessel flow assessment, during continuous exercise accelerated by Compressed SENSE: preliminary results in healthy volunteers , 2020, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[13]  P. Kellman,et al.  Assessment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pixelwise Quantitative Perfusion Mapping. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  D. Berman,et al.  Gadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[16]  P. Rancoita,et al.  Feature tracking and mapping analysis of myocardial response to improved perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina treated by coronary sinus Reducer implantation: a CMR study , 2020, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[17]  E. Nagel,et al.  Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update , 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  D. Andreini,et al.  CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  E. Nagel,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update , 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. , 2019, European heart journal.

[21]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Society of cardiovascular computed tomography expert consensus document on myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging. , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[22]  V. Lorenzoni,et al.  Anatomical and functional coronary imaging to predict long-term outcome in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the EVINCI-outcome study. , 2019, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[23]  D. Andreini,et al.  Diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging for stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[24]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Supriyo Chakraborty,et al.  A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics , 2019, Journal of cellular physiology.

[26]  J. Stehli,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study , 2019, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[27]  D. Andreini,et al.  Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[28]  T. Leiner,et al.  Anatomical and Functional Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[29]  Taylor M. Duguay,et al.  Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[30]  Mauro Pepi,et al.  Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[31]  P. Kellman,et al.  Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[32]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Frontier in Cardiac Imaging , 2018, BioMed research international.

[33]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[34]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European heart journal.

[35]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability , 2018, European heart journal.

[36]  H. Bøtker,et al.  Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy , 2018, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[37]  S. Piechnik,et al.  Diagnosis of Microvascular Angina Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  Mauro Pepi,et al.  Incremental Diagnostic Value of Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion With Whole-Heart Coverage CT Scanner in Intermediate- to High-Risk Symptomatic Patients Suspected of Coronary Artery Disease. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[39]  S. Plein,et al.  Effects of hyperaemia on left ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2018, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[40]  Amedeo Chiribiri,et al.  Prognostic Value of Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[41]  Marie Maagaard,et al.  Dynamic bicycle exercise to assess cardiac output at multiple exercise levels during magnetic resonance imaging. , 2017, Clinical imaging.

[42]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Myocardial computed tomography perfusion. , 2017, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[43]  S. Piechnik,et al.  State-of-the-art review: stress T1 mapping—technical considerations, pitfalls and emerging clinical applications , 2017, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[44]  R. Fattori,et al.  Utility of stress perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance in follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions of the left main coronary artery , 2017, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[45]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Prognostic Value of Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging versus Invasive Coronary Angiography and Nuclear Stress Perfusion Imaging in the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The CORE320 Multicenter Study. , 2017, Radiology.

[46]  L. Sharples,et al.  Effect of Care Guided by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[47]  A. Briasoulis,et al.  Incremental Value of Two Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in the Functional Assessment and Characterization of Subclinical Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 2016, Current cardiology reviews.

[48]  Jackie Szymonifka,et al.  Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis , 2016, European heart journal.

[49]  Jackie Szymonifka,et al.  Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[50]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Incremental diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over coronary angiography stratified by pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary artery calcification: The CORE320 study. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[51]  M. Budoff,et al.  A randomized, multicenter, multivendor study of myocardial perfusion imaging with regadenoson CT perfusion vs single photon emission CT. , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[52]  E. Nagel,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[53]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. , 2014, European heart journal.

[54]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[55]  K. Taguchi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[56]  J. Schwitter,et al.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. , 2013, European heart journal.

[57]  E. Nagel,et al.  European cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EuroCMR) registry – multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[58]  S. Plein,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[59]  N. Paul,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[60]  R. Cury,et al.  Dipyridamole stress and rest transmural myocardial perfusion ratio evaluation by 64 detector-row computed tomography. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[61]  C. Rochitte,et al.  Additional value of dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion by 64-row computed tomography in patients with coronary stents. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[62]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[63]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[64]  M. Forsting,et al.  Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients after invasive coronary revascularization with stent placement , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[65]  A. van Rossum,et al.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. , 2008, European heart journal.

[66]  D. Andreini,et al.  State-of-the-art-myocardial perfusion stress testing: Static CT perfusion. , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[67]  W. Brenner,et al.  Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 multicenter diagnostic performance study. , 2014, Radiology.

[68]  B. Gersh,et al.  ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease — addenda The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology , 2013 .

[69]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[70]  N. Paul,et al.  Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.