Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling.

We examined the contribution of optical and photoreceptor properties as well as receptor pooling to eccentricity-dependent variations in spatial vision by comparing the performance of ideal observers with that of human observers. We measured contrast sensitivity functions in human observers and calculated such functions in ideal observers for retinal eccentricities of 0-40 deg. Comparisons of human and ideal performance in a variety of tasks reveal that many aspects of the variation in spatial vision with eccentricity can be understood from an analysis of the discrimination information available at the retinal ganglion cells.

[1]  J Rovamo,et al.  Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity , 1980, Vision Research.

[3]  L A Temme,et al.  Peripheral Visual Field is Radially Organized , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[4]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[5]  H E Bedell,et al.  Magnitude of lateral chromatic aberration across the retina of the human eye. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[7]  M. Campbell,et al.  The optical transverse chromatic aberration on the fovea of the human eye , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[9]  C. E. Ferree,et al.  REFRACTION FOR THE PERIPHERAL FIELD OF VISION , 1931 .

[10]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields in old-world monkeys are oriented radially , 1986, Brain Research.

[11]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[12]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  L. Thibos.  Calculation of the influence of lateral chromatic aberration on image quality across the visual field. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  Post-receptoral undersampling in normal human peripheral vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[16]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  Averaging over the foveal receptor aperture curtails aliasing , 1983, Vision Research.

[17]  W S Geisler,et al.  Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  W. Charman,et al.  Off-axis image quality in the human eye , 1981, Vision Research.

[19]  H. Wässle,et al.  Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centres in the cat retina. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[21]  M E Wilson,et al.  Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  W. Geisler.  Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989 .

[23]  R A Smith,et al.  Aliasing in the parafovea with incoherent light. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  E. Switkes,et al.  Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. II. Retinotopic organization , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  H. H. Hopkins.  The Application of Frequency Response Techniques in Optics , 1962 .

[26]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[27]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  F. W. Weymouth.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  D M Levi,et al.  Peripheral hyperacuity: isoeccentric bisection is better than radial bisection. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea , 1991, Vision Research.

[32]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The physical limits of grating visibility , 1987, Vision Research.

[34]  L. Thibos,et al.  Retinal limits to the detection and resolution of gratings. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.