A Numerical Method for Cost-Weight Optimisation of Stringer-Skin Panels

The need to integrate cost into the early product definition process as an engineering parameter is addressed. The application studied is a fuselage panel that is typical for commercial transport regional jets. Consequently, a semi-empirical numerical analysis using reference data was coupled to model the structural integrity of thin-walled structures with regard to material failure and buckling: skin, stringer, flexural, and interrivet. The optimization process focuses on direct operating cost (DOC) as a function of acquisition cost and fuel burn. It was found that the ratio of acquisition cost to fuel burn was typically 4:3 and that there was a 10% improvement in the DOC for the minimal DOC condition over the minimal weight condition because of the manufacturing cost saving from having a reduced number of larger-area stringers and a slightly thicker skin than that preferred by the minimal weight condition. Also note that the minimal manufacturing cost condition was slightly better than the minimal weight condition, which highlights the key finding: The traditional minimal weight condition is a dated and suboptimal approach to airframe structural design.

[1]  Alice E. Smith,et al.  COST ESTIMATION PREDICTIVE MODELING: REGRESSION VERSUS NEURAL NETWORK , 1997 .

[2]  Paolo Ermanni,et al.  Cost Efficiency of Highly Integrated Fuselage Structures: Comparison Between Metals and Composites , 1991 .

[3]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Aerospace Manufacturing Cost Prediction from a Measure of Part Definition Information , 2001 .

[4]  Leo S. Wierda Design-oriented Cost Information: the Need and the Possibilities , 1990 .

[5]  R. T. Savely,et al.  Fuzzy logic and neural network technologies , 1992 .

[6]  Joseph Butterfield,et al.  Integration of Aerodynamic, Structural, Cost and Manufacturing Cosiderations During the Conceptual Design of a Thrust Reverser Cascade , 2004 .

[7]  Hamdi A. Bashir,et al.  Estimating Design Complexity , 1999 .

[8]  Howard Bloom Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle , 1989 .

[9]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  Product and process coupling in multidisciplinary design of flight vehicle structures , 1998 .

[10]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Effects of Alternative Wing Structural Concepts on High Speed Civil transport Life Cycle Costs , 1996 .

[11]  B Dean Edwin,et al.  Elements of Designing for Cost , 1992 .

[12]  Richard Curran,et al.  Linking Engineering Costs and DFMA for Integrated Aircraft Design , 2003 .

[13]  Guo Q. Huang,et al.  Design for Cost: Past Experience and Recent Development , 1991 .

[14]  David M. Dilts,et al.  Automated design-to-cost: integrating costing into the design decision , 1996, Comput. Aided Des..