Passive haptics significantly enhances virtual environments

One of the most disconcertingly unnatural properties of most virtual environments (VEs) is the ability of the user to pass through objects. I hypothesize that passive haptics, augmenting a high-fidelity visual virtual environment with low-fidelity physical objects, will markedly improve both sense of presence and spatial knowledge training transfer. The low-fidelity physical models can be constructed from cheap, easy-to-assemble materials such as styrofoam, plywood, and particle board. The first study investigated the effects of augmenting a visual-cliff environment with a slight physical ledge on participants' sense of presence. I found when participants experienced passive haptics in the VE, they exhibited significantly more behaviors associated with pit avoidance than when experiencing the non-augmented VE. Changes in heart rate and skin conductivity were significantly higher than when they experienced the VE without passive haptics. The second study investigated passive haptics' effects on performance of a real-world navigation task after training in a virtual environment. Half of the participants trained on maze navigation in a VE augmented with a styrofoam physical model, while half trained in a non-augmented VE but were given visual and audio contact cues. The task was to gain as much information as possible about the layout of the environment. Participants knew before the VE session that their training would be tested by navigating an identical real maze environment while blindfolded. Significant differences in the time to complete the blindfolded navigation task and significant differences in the number of collisions with objects were found between the participants trained in an augmented VE and the participants trained in a non-augmented VE. 11 of 15 participants trained without passive haptics bumped into the next-to-last obstacle encountered in the testing session and turned the wrong direction to navigate around it: only 2 of 15 participants trained with passive haptics made the same navigation error. On the other hand, the assessment of the participants' cognitive maps of the virtual environment did not find significant differences between groups as measured by sketch maps and object dimension estimation.

[1]  J. Guilford.  The Guilford‐Zimmerman Aptitude Survey , 1956 .

[2]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[3]  I. Rock,et al.  Vision and touch. , 1967, Scientific American.

[4]  H. Lobb.  Asymmetrical transfer of form discrimination across sensory modalities in human adults. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Visual-proprioceptive interaction under large amounts of conflict. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  E. A. Miller.  Interaction of vision and touch in conflict and nonconflict form perception tasks. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  D. Smothergill.  Accuracy and variability in the localization of spatial targets at three age levels. , 1973 .

[8]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[9]  D. C. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of self-report and overt-behavioral procedures for assessing acrophobia. , 1977 .

[10]  R. Welch.  Perceptual Modification: Adapting to Altered Sensory Environments , 1978 .

[11]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[12]  Shin Murakoshi.  Cognitive Map and Spatial Behavior , 1987 .

[13]  M. Heller.  The Psychology of Touch , 1991 .

[14]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A demonstrated optical tracker with scalable work area for head-mounted display systems , 1992, I3D '92.

[15]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Distal Attribution and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  David Zeltzer,et al.  Autonomy, Interaction, and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[19]  K. Hinckley,et al.  Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization , 1994, CHI '94.

[20]  Ken Hinckley,et al.  Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization , 1994, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[21]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence and performance within virtual environments , 1995 .

[22]  Mel Slater,et al.  Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality , 1995, TCHI.

[23]  James S. Williford,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. , 1995, The American journal of psychiatry.

[24]  Rob Kooper,et al.  Virtual Environments for Treating the Fear of Heights , 1995, Computer.

[25]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Virtual environments and advanced interface design , 1995 .

[26]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[27]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  Eugenia M. Kolasinski,et al.  Prediction of simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 1996 .

[29]  James P. Bliss,et al.  The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Administering Spatial Navigation Training to Firefighters , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[31]  Greg Welch,et al.  SCAAT: incremental tracking with incomplete information , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[32]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 3rd ed. , 1998 .

[33]  Earl Hunt,et al.  The Transfer of Spatial Knowledge in Virtual Environment Training , 1998, Presence.

[34]  Brenda K. Wiederhold,et al.  Fear of Flying: A Case Report Using Virtual Reality Therapy with Physiological Monitoring , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Locus of User-Initiated Control in Virtual Environments: Influences on Cybersickness , 1998, Presence.

[36]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[37]  Robert W. Lindeman,et al.  Hand-held windows: towards effective 2D interaction in immersive virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[38]  David Waller,et al.  Factors Affecting the Perception of Interobject Distances in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence.

[39]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[40]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[41]  E. A. Attree,et al.  The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. , 1999, Memory.

[42]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[43]  Effects of field of view on performance with head-mounted displays , 2000 .

[44]  F. Brooks,et al.  Physiological Reaction as an Objective Measure of Presence in Virtual Environments , 2001 .