An approach for analyzing and managing flexibility in engineering systems design based on decision rules and multistage stochastic programming

ABSTRACT This article introduces an approach to assess the value and manage flexibility in engineering systems design based on decision rules and stochastic programming. The approach differs from standard Real Options Analysis (ROA) that relies on dynamic programming in that it parameterizes the decision variables used to design and manage the flexible system in operations. Decision rules are based on heuristic-triggering mechanisms that are used by Decision Makers (DMs) to determine when it is appropriate to exercise the flexibility. They can be treated similarly as, and combined with, physical design variables, and optimal values can be determined using multistage stochastic programming techniques. The proposed approach is applied as demonstration to the analysis of a flexible hybrid waste-to-energy system with two independent flexibility strategies under two independent uncertainty drivers in an urban environment subject to growing waste generation. Results show that the proposed approach recognizes the value of flexibility to a similar extent as the standard ROA. The form of the solution provides intuitive guidelines to DMs for exercising the flexibility in operations. The demonstration shows that the method is suitable to analyze complex systems and problems when multiple uncertainty sources and different flexibility strategies are considered simultaneously.

[1]  R Bellman,et al.  On the Theory of Dynamic Programming. , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[3]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Roger J.-B. Wets,et al.  On decision rules in stochastic programming , 1974, Math. Program..

[5]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[6]  R. McDonald,et al.  Investment and the Valuation of Firms When There Is an Option to Shut Down , 1985 .

[7]  B. Kamrad,et al.  Multinomial Approximating Models for Options with k State Variables , 1991 .

[8]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Probabilistic-Based Design Model for Achieving Flexibility in Design , 1999 .

[9]  K. Min,et al.  Generation planning for inter-related generation units: a real options approach , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).

[10]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[11]  G. Friedl Copeland, Tom/Antikarov, Vladimir, Real Options. A Practitioner’s Guide, Texere LLC, New York 2001, $ 59,95 , 2002 .

[12]  Chung-Li Tseng,et al.  Valuing Flexibility in Infrastructure Expansion , 2003 .

[13]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  A real-options-based analysis for supply chain decisions , 2005 .

[15]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Using Binomial Decision Trees to Solve Real-Option Valuation Problems , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[16]  Nikolaos Georgiopoulos Real Options , 2006 .

[17]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Flexible product platforms: framework and case study , 2007, DAC 2006.

[18]  C. Y. Cheah,et al.  Valuing governmental support in infrastructure projects as real options using Monte Carlo simulation , 2006 .

[19]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options by Spreadsheet: Parking Garage Case Example , 2006 .

[20]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Measuring the Value of Flexibility in Space Systems: A Six-Element Framework: Regular Papers , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Measuring the Value of Flexibility in Space Systems: A Six‐Element Framework , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[22]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[23]  Osman Alp,et al.  Tactical capacity management under capacity flexibility , 2008 .

[24]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[25]  Daniel Kuhn,et al.  Bound-based decision rules in multistage stochastic programming , 2008, Kybernetika.

[26]  Vladan Babovic,et al.  Reducing Risk Through Real Options in Systems Design: The Case of Architecting a Maritime Domain Protection System , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory , 2009 .

[28]  Vladan Babovic,et al.  An Evolutionary Real Options Framework for the Design and Management of Projects and Systems with Complex Real Options and Exercising Conditions , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Flexibility in Engineering Design , 2011 .

[30]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Real options analysis : tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions , 2012 .

[31]  J. Jiao Product platform flexibility planning by hybrid real options analysis , 2012 .

[32]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  A technique to assess the changeability of complex engineering systems , 2013 .

[33]  Michel-Alexandre Cardin,et al.  Enabling Flexibility in Engineering Systems: A Taxonomy of Procedures and a Design Framework , 2014 .

[34]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Managing and supporting product life cycle through engineering change management for a complex product , 2015 .

[35]  Daniel Kuhn,et al.  Generalized decision rule approximations for stochastic programming via liftings , 2014, Mathematical Programming.

[36]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  A simulation-based method to evaluate the impact of product architecture on product evolvability , 2015 .

[37]  Michel-Alexandre Cardin,et al.  Generating flexibility in the design of engineering systems to enable better sustainability and lifecycle performance , 2015 .