Phonetic evidence for phonological structure in syllabification

It has been widely observed that codas are marked vis-à-vis onsets. In adult languages, coda markedness manifests itself in two ways: some languages do not tolerate codas at all (e.g. Cayuvava (Key 1961), Senufo (Clements and Keyser 1983)), while virtually all languages that do permit codas place restrictions on what this position can license. Coda markedness has consequences for the syllabification of consonants at the right edge of words as well. While one view is that final consonants are always syllabified as codas, there are many languages for which this analysis is not motivated. In the 1980s, final consonants were commonly designated as extraprosodic in these types of languages (Steriade 1982; Borowsky 1986; Itô 1986). More recently, it has been observed that there is a striking parallel between right-edge extraprosodic consonants and onsets in many languages; accordingly, extraprosodic consonants have been interpreted as onsets of empty-headed syllables by a number of scholars (see e.g. Giegerich 1985; Kaye 1990; McCarthy and Prince 1990; Charette 1991; Piggott 1991, 1999; Rice 1992; Harris 1994). The marked status of codas is observed in child language as well. Early grammars show a strong preference for CV syllables, independent of the constraints of the target language (see e.g. Jakobson 1941/68; Ingram 1978; Fikkert 1994). When word-final consonants ultimately emerge, the predominant view is that they are syllabified as codas (e.g. Fikkert 1994; Demuth and Fee 1995; Stemberger 1996). In this paper, we argue against this view. We propose that right-edge consonants are first syllabified as onsets – specifically, as onset-nuclear sequences – regardless of their status in the language being acquired. The principal evidence in support of this view comes from the phonetic properties that characterize early obstruent-final CVC forms: for the final consonant, the presence of aspiration (final release), length, and homorganic nasal release; and for the medial vowel, the presence of length and post-vocalic pause. The data on which we base our analysis come from five English-speaking children between the ages of 18 and 26 months, shortly after the point when CVC forms emerge. We begin in §2 by laying out our assumptions about language acquisition and about the representations that we assume for segment structure and syllable structure. We turn in §3 to demonstrate how our views on syllable structure yield a three-way typology for the

[1]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[2]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[3]  Keren Rice,et al.  A reexamination of the feature [sonorant]: the status of sonorant obstruents' , 1993 .

[4]  Eduardo D. Faingold,et al.  On the acquisition of prosodic structure , 1997 .

[5]  John Laver,et al.  Principles of Phonetics: Principles of transcription , 1994 .

[6]  Keren Rice Default variability: The coronal-velar relationship , 1996 .

[7]  J. Gandour,et al.  Rule discovery in phonological acquisition , 1982, Journal of Child Language.

[8]  M. Mithun,et al.  The Phonology of Selayarese , 1986 .

[9]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology , 1990 .

[10]  GLYNE L. PIGOTT,et al.  At the right edge of words , 1999 .

[11]  Heinz J. Giegerich Metrical Phonology and Phonological Structure: German and English , 1985 .

[12]  Peter Avery,et al.  The representation of voicing contrasts (1996) , 1996 .

[13]  W. Léopold Speech development of a bilingual child : a linguist's record , 1941 .

[14]  U. Holmes The phonology of an English-speaking child , 1927 .

[15]  Keren Rice,et al.  On the interaction between sonorancy and voicing , 1989 .

[16]  Young-mee Yu Cho Parameters of consonantal assimilation , 1991 .

[17]  P. Keating,et al.  On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing , 1986, Journal of Linguistics.

[18]  T. Borowsky,et al.  Topics in the lexical phonology of English , 1993 .

[19]  Jean Lowenstamm,et al.  Constituent structure and government in phonology , 1990, Phonology.

[20]  GLYNE PIGGOTT APOCOPE AND THE LICENSING OF EMPTY-HEADED SYLLABLES , 1991 .

[21]  Keren Rice,et al.  On deriving sonority: a structural account of sonority relationships , 1992, Phonology.

[22]  Roy Lawrence Stafford An elementary Luo grammar, with vocabularies, , 1967 .

[23]  J. Kaye Phonology : a cognitive view , 1989 .

[24]  G. L. Piggott,et al.  Variability in feature dependency: The case of nasality , 1992 .

[25]  R. Jakobson Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals , 1980 .

[26]  Monik Charette,et al.  Conditions on Phonological Government , 1991 .

[27]  John Harris,et al.  English Sound Structure , 1994 .

[28]  L. Lombardi Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization , 1997 .

[29]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[30]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[31]  J. Goldsmith Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology , 1990 .

[32]  John Thayer Jensen,et al.  Yapese Reference Grammar , 1977 .

[33]  J. Blevins The Syllable in Phonological Theory , 1995 .

[34]  Daniel L. Everett,et al.  Reduplication and CV Skeleta in Kamaiura , 1985 .

[35]  B. Elson,et al.  Sierra Popoluca Syllable Structure , 1947, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[36]  Coda constraints : optimizing representations , 1998 .

[37]  A. Gnanadesikan Constraints in Phonological Acquisition: Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology , 2004 .

[38]  John Harris,et al.  Licensing Inheritance: an integrated theory of neutralisation , 1998, Phonology.

[39]  Harold Key,et al.  Phonotactics of Cayuvava , 1961, International Journal of American Linguistics.