The development of a panorama manifestation virtual reality system for navigation and a usability comparison with a desktop system

The virtual reality (VR) system has become popular in the last two decades and is being applied increasingly to navigation studies. This study developed a panorama manifestation (PM) VR system, with six monitors forming a circular display and an interactive chair equipped with rotation sensors and operating knobs. The advantages of the PM system include a large circular display, a body-centred design, body engagement and a low set-up cost. Based on navigation experimental tasks, this system's usability was compared with that of a typical desktop (DT) system. The results showed that participants using the PM system had a significantly higher success rate and required less completion time than participants using the DT system, indicating that the PM system outperforms the DT system in terms of effectiveness and efficiency in some navigation tasks, and also suggesting that the PM system may require lower spatial cognition workload in the navigation tasks. However, the participants’ subjective evaluations of task difficulty (TD) failed to reach significance although the PM group did report a lower mean value for TD. Additionally, in the PM system, the participants’ spatial ability was more predictive to their navigation performance than that in the DT system, indicating that the PM system offered greater usability for some spatial experiments and could provide more support for participants’ navigation tasks.

[1]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  A head-mounted three dimensional display , 1968, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[2]  T. Gärling,et al.  Orientation in buildings: effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids. , 1983, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  A. Tait.  Desktop Virtual Reality , 1992, Encyclopedia of Multimedia.

[4]  Carolina Cruz-Neira,et al.  Surround-Screen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE , 2023 .

[5]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Fish tank virtual reality , 1993, INTERCHI.

[6]  Jun Rekimoto.  A vision-based head tracker for fish tank virtual reality-VR without head gear , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[7]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Effects of participating in virtual environmentsa review of current knowledge , 1996 .

[8]  Chung-Hsi Huang Chung-Hsi Huang,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A LOW COST MOTION CHAIR FOR VIDEO GAMES AND MPEG VIDEO PLAYBACK , 1996, 1996. Digest of Technical Papers., International Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[9]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  Navigating Large-Scale Virtual Environments: What Differences Occur Between Helmet-Mounted and Desk-Top Displays? , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Robert van Liere,et al.  Enhancing fish tank VR , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[11]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[12]  MÁRCIO SEROLLI PINHO,et al.  A User Interface Model for Navigation in Virtual Environments , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[13]  Martin Hachet,et al.  The Interaction Table - a New Input Device Designed for Interaction in Immersive Large Display Environments , 2002, EGVE.

[14]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Human Behavior and Performance with Different Display Devices for Virtual Environments , 2002 .

[15]  Michael Cohen,et al.  The Internet Chair , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Angelia Sebok,et al.  Navigation in desktop virtual environments: an evaluation and recommendations for supporting usability , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[17]  H. Mallot,et al.  Learned association of allocentric and egocentric information in the hippocampus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S. Wilson,et al.  Navigational tools for desktop virtual environment interfaces , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[19]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[20]  Sarah Nichols,et al.  Interaction with a desktop virtual environment: a 2D view into a 3D world , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[21]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information‐rich virtual environments , 2005, VRST '05.

[22]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Measuring vection in a large screen virtual environment , 2005, APGV '05.

[23]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Neural Processing of Spatial Information: What We Know about Place Cells and What They Can Tell Us about Presence , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[24]  David Waller,et al.  The HIVE: A huge immersive virtual environment for research in spatial cognition , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Hybrid Display System for Motion-Following Tasks , 2007, HCI.

[26]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  The effect of display size on performance of operational tasks with UAVs , 2007 .

[27]  Nikos Papadopoulos,et al.  Full immersive virtual environment CAVETM in chemistry education , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Prabhat,et al.  A Comparative Study of Desktop, Fishtank, and Cave Systems for the Exploration of Volume Rendered Confocal Data Sets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[29]  Samuel S. Silva,et al.  Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study , 2008, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[30]  Alessandro O. Caffò,et al.  Assessing human reorientation ability inside virtual reality environments: the effects of retention interval and landmark characteristics , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[31]  Amarnath Banerjee,et al.  A self-configurable large-scale virtual manufacturing environment for collaborative designers , 2011, Virtual Reality.

[32]  Aga Skorupka,et al.  Comparing Human Wayfinding Behavior in Real and Virtual Environment , 2009 .

[33]  Shana Smith,et al.  Using immersive game-based virtual reality to teach fire-safety skills to children , 2009, Virtual Reality.

[34]  T. Schenk,et al.  Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Egon L. van den Broek,et al.  Navigating through Virtual Environments: Visual Realism Improves Spatial Cognition , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  Rosa Maria Esteves Moreira da Costa,et al.  The Influence of Intelligent Characters on Users' Navigation Through a Three-Dimensional Virtual Environment , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[37]  Egon L. van den Broek,et al.  Representing 3D virtual objects: Interaction between visuo-spatial ability and type of exploration , 2010, Vision Research.

[38]  Christos Bouras,et al.  Performance improvement of Distributed Virtual Environments by exploiting objects’ attributes , 2011, Virtual Reality.

[39]  Mohammad Ali Amiri Atashgah,et al.  An integrated virtual environment for feasibility studies and implementation of aerial MonoSLAM , 2011, Virtual Reality.

[40]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  Narrowing gender-based performance gaps in virtual environment navigation , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Eric D. Ragan,et al.  Supporting cognitive processing with spatial information presentations in virtual environments , 2012, Virtual Reality.