Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis

Many previous papers have lamented the fact that the findings of past GSS research have been inconsistent. This paper develops a new model for interpreting GSS effects on performance (a Fit-Appropriation Model), which argues that GSS performance is affected by two factors. The first is the fit between the task and the GSS structures selected for use (i.e., communication support and information processing support). The second is the appropriation support the group receives in the form of training, facilitation, and software restrictiveness to help them effectively incorporate the selected GSS structures into their meeting process. A meta-analysis using this model to organize and classify past research found that when used appropriately (i.e., there is a fit between the GSS structures and the task, and the group receives appropriation support), GSS use increased the number of ideas generated, took less time, and led to more satisfied participants than if the group worked without the GSS. Fitting the GSS to the task had the most impact on outcome effectiveness (decision quality and ideas), while appropriation support had the most impact on the process (time required and process satisfaction). We conclude that when using this theoretical lens, the results of GSS research do not appear inconsistent.

[1]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Measuring satisfaction in GSS meetings , 1997, ICIS '97.

[2]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor , 1993, TOIS.

[3]  M. Winniford,et al.  Issues in automated voting , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[5]  L. Floyd Lewis,et al.  A decision support system for face-to-face groups , 1987, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Laurel Austin,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Face-to-Face Collaborative Technology on Group Writing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Business Process Modeling with Group Support Systems , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[9]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[10]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[11]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Groups, Tasks, and Technology , 1993 .

[14]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[16]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[18]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[19]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  Effects of computer-mediated communication on group negotiation: an empirical study , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  The Application of Electronic Meeting Technology to Support Strategic Management , 1992, MIS Q..

[21]  T. Kline,et al.  A review of the groupware literature: Theories, methodologies, and a research agenda. , 1999 .

[22]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[23]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Face to Face versus Computer Mediated Communication Channels , 1999 .

[24]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Information Is What You Make of It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  S. Harkins,et al.  Information Utility and the Multiple Source Effect , 1987 .

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The debiasing role of group support systems: an experimental investigation of the representativeness bias , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[30]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Group Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication Media , 1994 .

[31]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Suppressing the contribution of the group's best member: is GDSS use appropriate for all group tasks? , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems: Intended and Unintended Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[34]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[35]  Wei Huang,et al.  Why does a GSS fail to enhance group consensus and satisfaction? An investigation from an influence process perspective , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[37]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Systems: Evidence from a Low Structure Environment , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems: A Review and Assessment , 1993 .

[39]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  Group support for technical review teams: an exploratory investigation , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Information technology support for collaborative decision making in auditing: An experimental investigation , 1996, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Victoria K. Clawson,et al.  The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings , 1993 .

[43]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming , 1998 .

[44]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An exploratory comparison of four modes of communication for determining requirements: results on creativity, quality and satisfaction , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[45]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[48]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Element Finding: The Impact of a Group Support System on a Crucial Phase of Sense Making , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Wei Huang,et al.  Compensating effects of GSS on group performance , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[51]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[52]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[53]  Richard E. Yellen,et al.  Extraversion and introversion in electronically-supported meetings , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[54]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[55]  Henrik Lewe,et al.  Computer support and facilitated structure in meetings-an empirical comparison of their impact , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[56]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer support for distributed asynchronous software design teams: experimental results on creativity and quality , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[57]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Importance of Facilitator Role Behaviors: Implications for Training Facilitators to Use GSS , 1996 .

[58]  Kate M. Kaiser,et al.  An investigation of satisfaction when using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed meetings , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[59]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Blocking electronic brainstorms. , 1994 .

[60]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Vanessa Chang,et al.  Empowering system developers through alternate methods and technologies: testing the efficacy of GDSS (group decision support systems) , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[62]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .

[63]  P. McLeod,et al.  The eyes have it : Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion , 1997 .

[64]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Athletics in electronic brainstorming: asynchronous electronic brainstorming in very large groups , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[65]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Meeting facilitation: process versus content interventions , 1999 .

[66]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[67]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[68]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[69]  B. Daily,et al.  The influence of group decision support systems on contribution and commitment levels in multicultural and culturally homogeneous decision-making groups , 1998 .

[70]  Hsin-Ginn Hwang,et al.  The effect of group size on group performance in computer-supported decision making , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[71]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[72]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[73]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997 .

[74]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  Decision Making under Time Pressure , 1997 .

[75]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[76]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes , 1995 .

[77]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  GSS meeting productivity and participation equity: a US and Mexico cross-cultural field study , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[80]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[81]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[82]  Renée A. Beauclair,et al.  An experimental study of GDSS support application effectiveness , 1989, J. Inf. Sci..

[83]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[84]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[86]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems , 1999, DATB.

[87]  A. Dennis Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[88]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[89]  J. Livari,et al.  The organizational fit of information systems , 1992 .

[90]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[91]  Steven R. Ash,et al.  The effects of a group decision support system on culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous group decision making , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[92]  Carol Saunders,et al.  Information acquisition in group decision making , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[93]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[94]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[95]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  The Effects of Group Decision Support Systems and Task Structures on Group Communication and Decision Quality , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[96]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[97]  J. Hackman,et al.  Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups , 1974 .

[98]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[99]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Technological Support for Group Process Modeling , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..