Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: a review of current techniques.

BACKGROUND Radiographic angles are commonly used in patients with hallux valgus deformity to assess the severity, plan surgery, assess outcome and compare results. Many different manual methods have been used, but are prone to error. More recently computer-assisted methods using software have become available. OBJECTIVE To review the different methods that have been used to measure radiographic angles in hallux valgus. METHOD A general literature search using relevant key words was undertaken using databases such as Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Cochrane Library. REVIEW FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: The manual methods used are prone to errors. The reliability can be improved by using standardised radiographic technique and measurement technique using specific reference points. Computer-assisted methods using software, might improve reliability of measurements. Further studies are needed to assess if these methods are easy to use, and to compare different software's that are available. Specifically designed software for the foot might further improve the reliability of radiographic measurements in hallux valgus.

[1]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Osteotomy-bunionectomy for hallux valgus. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  M. J. Stewart,et al.  Hallux Valgus Assessment: Report of Research Committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society , 1984, Foot & ankle.

[3]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Radiologic Anatomy of the Painful Bunionette , 1990, Foot & ankle.

[4]  L. SIM-FOOK,et al.  A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Reliability of Standard Foot Radiographic Measurements , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  K. Knahr,et al.  Intra- and interobserver repeatability of radiographic measurements in hallux surgery: improvement and validation of a method. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[7]  Fielden Em,et al.  Sources of Error in the Production and Measurement of Standard Radiographs of the Foot , 1951 .

[8]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Intra- and Inter-observer Reliability of the Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle in Adult Hallux Valgus , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[9]  T Kato,et al.  The etiology of hallux valgus in Japan. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  M. Stephens,et al.  ii) Operative decision making in hallux valgus , 2002 .

[11]  Mohamed Abdullatif.  REPAIR OF HALLUX VALGUS WITH A DISTAL-SOFT-TISSUE PROCEDURE AND PROXIMAL METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY. , 2005 .

[12]  T. Cochrane,et al.  Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[13]  K. Knahr,et al.  Reproducibility of the Radiographic Metatarsophalangeal Angle in Hallux Surgery , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J. Miller.  Distal first metatarsal displacement osteotomy. Its place in the schema of bunion surgery. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  P VENNING,et al.  Sources of error in the production and measurement of standard radiographs of the foot. , 1951, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Daniel C. Farber,et al.  Goniometric Versus Computerized Angle Measurement in Assessing Hallux Valgus , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[17]  L. Ryd,et al.  Measuring Hallux Valgus: A Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Clinical Parameters with Regard to Measurement Accuracy , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  David B. Thordarson,et al.  Foot and ankle , 2004 .

[19]  田中 康仁.  Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus : A two-dimensional coordinate system , 1996 .

[20]  K. Klaue,et al.  Clinical, Quantitative Assessment of First Tarsometatarsal Mobility in the Sagittal Plane and Its Relation to Hallux Valgus Deformity* , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[21]  I. Meschan.  Radiology of the normal foot , 1970 .

[22]  D. FitzPatrick,et al.  The Mitchell distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  F. Condon,et al.  The First Intermetatarsal Angle in Hallux Valgus: An Analysis of Measurement Reliability and the Error Involved , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[24]  K. Knahr,et al.  Metatarsophalangeal and Intermetatarsal Angle: Different Values and Interpretation of Postoperative Results Dependent on the Technique of Measurement , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  Charles L Saltzman,et al.  Angular Measurements in the Evaluation of Hallux Valgus Deformities: A Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the American Orthopædic Foot & Ankle Society on Angular Measurements , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[26]  Carlos Piqué-Vidal,et al.  Radiographic Angles in Hallux Valgus: Differences Between Measurements Made Manually and With a Computerized Program , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[27]  M. Coughlin,et al.  The Reliability of Angular Measurements in Hallux Valgus Deformities , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[28]  S. Trevino,et al.  Comparison between Manual and Computer-Assisted Measurements of Hallux Valgus Parameters , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[29]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the First Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[30]  L. Rangaswamy.  The Video Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery. , 1991 .

[31]  M. Myerson,et al.  Hypermobility of the first ray. , 2000, Foot and ankle clinics.

[32]  D. Hedrick,et al.  CORRECTION OF HALLUX VALGUS BY METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY , 1945 .

[33]  C. Nguyen,et al.  Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.