Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging

The physiological noise in the resting brain, which arises from fluctuations in metabolic‐linked brain physiology and subtle brain pulsations, was investigated in six healthy volunteers using oxygenation‐sensitive dual‐echo spiral MRI at 3.0 T. In contrast to the system and thermal noise, the physiological noise demonstrates a signal strength dependency and, unique to the metabolic‐linked noise, an echo‐time dependency. Variations of the MR signal strength by changing the flip angle and echo time allowed separation of the different noise components and revealed that the physiological noise at 3.0 T (1) exceeds other noise sources and (2) is significantly greater in cortical gray matter than in white matter regions. The SNR in oxygenation‐sensitive MRI is predicted to saturate at higher fields, suggesting that noise measurements of the resting brain at 3.0 T and higher may provide a sensitive probe of functional information. Magn Reson Med 46:631–637, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples , 1979 .

[2]  W. Edelstein,et al.  The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J. Pauly,et al.  Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  B. Rosen,et al.  MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral Physiology , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  Fast Spiral Coronary Artery Imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[8]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  G H Glover,et al.  Motion Artifacts in fMRI: Comparison of 2DFT with PR and Spiral Scan Methods , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Integrated RF coil with stabilization for fMRI human cortex , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  G. Glover,et al.  Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  G H Glover,et al.  Simple analytic spiral K‐space algorithm , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Comparison of 3D BOLD Functional MRI with Spiral Acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Comparison of the TE and field strength dependence of single shot image S/N and time series standard deviation in humans and phantoms , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  A Jesmanowicz,et al.  B0‐fluctuation‐induced temporal variation in EPI image series due to the disturbance of steady‐state free precession , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.