The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time

Bringing new products to the marketplace faster has become a strategic imperative in many markets, especially high technology industries. Much attention has focused on techniques purported to bring products to the market more quickly, but little empirical research has been conducted to validate these techniques. This study tests the relationship between the popular time to market acceleration techniques and product development time in a sample of electronics companies. Our findings suggest that only four of the 12 techniques we studied are significantly related with development time performance as proposed. We found that fast developers had teams that were cross functional, dedicated, included fast time to market as a development goal, and overlapped development activities more so than slow developers. Our regression results were very significant, and accounted for 32% of the variance in development time performance. We concluded, however, given many of techniques were not supported that successful fast cycle development can not be accomplished by using a sporadic combination of factors. Furthermore, we feel additional research is needed to explore the interaction and mediating effects of these techniques upon each other, as well as identify other intermediate processes and external conditions that may also affect product development effectiveness.

[1]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[2]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Time management in new product development: Case study findings , 1992 .

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  A Framework for Including the Value of Time in Design-for-manufacturing Decision Making , 1993 .

[4]  R. Schmenner,et al.  Collapsing new product development times: Six case studies , 1992 .

[5]  Willard I. Zangwill,et al.  Lightning strategies for innovation : how the world's best firms create new products , 1993 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[7]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  Protocol: New tool for product innovation , 1984 .

[8]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[9]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .

[10]  R. Cordero.  Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .

[11]  Linda Rochford,et al.  How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process , 1992 .

[12]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products , 1990 .

[13]  C. Crawford.  The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[14]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[15]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Fast-Cycle Capability for Competitive Power , 1988 .

[16]  Warren B. Brown,et al.  Leading the way to faster new product development , 1993 .

[17]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[18]  Arnoud De Meyer,et al.  The contribution of manufacturing to shortening design cycle times , 1990 .

[19]  A. Paul Emmanuelides,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TIME: A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS. , 1991 .

[20]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[21]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[22]  G. Stalk.  Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .

[23]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .