Laissez faire and the Clean Development Mechanism: determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003–2011

India is the world’s second-largest host of projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). There is, however, considerable variation in the distribution of CDM projects implemented across different Indian states. While a large body of the literature examines cross-national variation in the implementation of CDM projects, few studies have analyzed the determinants of sub-national variation in different national contexts. We theorize that given India’s laissez-faire approach to CDM project implementation the availability of profitable climate mitigation opportunities and the political stability are two factors that promote CDM project implementation. Using sub-national data collected from a variety of sources, we conduct systematic analysis that provides empirical support for a set of hypotheses regarding the effects of these variables on project implementation. First, we find that states with a lot of public electricity-generating capacity and industrial capital implement more CDM projects than other states. Additionally, project developers rarely propose CDM projects during election years as a result of high levels of political uncertainty associated with those years. Our findings show that India’s liberal approach prevents the central government from using the CDM to promote sustainable development in less developed states. In India and other host countries where coordinated national policies to maximize their gains from CDM projects is absent, there is a paucity of project implementation in states that need it the most.

[1]  Q. Vuong Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[2]  Patrick T. Brandt,et al.  Dynamic modeling for persistent event-count time series , 2000 .

[3]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[4]  J. Hourcade,et al.  Clean development mechanism: leverage for development? , 2001 .

[5]  Shalini Randeria Between Cunning States and Unaccountable International Institutions : Social Movements and Rights of Local Communities to Common Property Resources , 2003 .

[6]  M. Grubb The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[7]  C. Caseldine Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Prospects for developing countries , 2005 .

[8]  Rahul Tongia The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform: The political economy of Indian power sector reforms , 2007 .

[9]  Additionality determination of Indian CDM projects Can Indian CDM project developers outwit the CDM Executive Board? Discussion Paper CDM-1 February 2007 , 2007 .

[10]  A. Ellerman,et al.  The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results , 2007, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[11]  S. Sirohi CDM: Is it a ‘win–win’ strategy for rural poverty alleviation in India? , 2007 .

[12]  Zhao Jun,et al.  Prospect of concentrating solar power in China : the sustainable future , 2008 .

[13]  Yann Ménière,et al.  The Clean Development Mechanism and the International Diffusion of Technologies: An Empirical Study , 2008 .

[14]  S. Ganapati,et al.  The clean development mechanism in China and India: A comparative institutional analysis , 2008 .

[15]  M. Schreurs From the Bottom Up , 2008 .

[16]  Miriam Schroeder Varieties of Carbon Governance: Utilizing the Clean Development Mechanism for Chinese Priorities , 2009 .

[17]  P. Curnow,et al.  Implementing CDM Projects: A Guidebook to Host Country Legal Issues , 2009 .

[18]  P. Newell Varieties of CDM Governance: Some Reflections , 2009 .

[19]  G. Benecke Varieties of Carbon Governance: Taking Stock of the Local Carbon Market in India , 2009 .

[20]  Harald Fuhr,et al.  Varieties of Carbon Governance in Newly Industrializing Countries , 2009 .

[21]  Liliana B. Andonova,et al.  The Rescaling of Global Environmental Politics , 2010 .

[22]  D. S. Arora,et al.  Indian Renewable Energy Status Report: Background Report for DIREC 2010 , 2010 .

[23]  Kelli Lynn Joseph,et al.  The politics of power: Electricity reform in India , 2010 .

[24]  A. Michaelowa,et al.  Would preferential access measures be sufficient to overcome current barriers to CDM projects in least developed countries? , 2011 .

[25]  M. Nüsser,et al.  Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Himalaya? Clean Development Dams in Himachal Pradesh, India , 2011 .

[26]  A. Dinar,et al.  Local Actions, Global Impacts: International Cooperation and the CDM , 2011, Global Environmental Politics.

[27]  D. Popp International Technology Transfer, Climate Change, and the Clean Development Mechanism , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[28]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Who uses the Clean Development Mechanism? An empirical analysis of projects in Chinese provinces , 2013 .