Transaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection

The problem of preprocessing transaction data for supervised fraud classification is considered. It is impractical to present an entire series of transactions to a fraud detection system, partly because of the very high dimensionality of such data but also because of the heterogeneity of the transactions. Hence, a framework for transaction aggregation is considered and its effectiveness is evaluated against transaction-level detection, using a variety of classification methods and a realistic cost-based performance measure. These methods are applied in two case studies using real data. Transaction aggregation is found to be advantageous in many but not all circumstances. Also, the length of the aggregation period has a large impact upon performance. Aggregation seems particularly effective when a random forest is used for classification. Moreover, random forests were found to perform better than other classification methods, including SVMs, logistic regression and KNN. Aggregation also has the advantage of not requiring precisely labeled data and may be more robust to the effects of population drift.

[1]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[2]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[3]  J. Friedman.  Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 1989 .

[4]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[5]  Douglas L. Reilly,et al.  Credit card fraud detection with a neural-network , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of Classifier Performance: Comparison under Imprecise Class and Cost Distributions , 1997, KDD.

[7]  Bernd Freisleben,et al.  CARDWATCH: a neural network based database mining system for credit card fraud detection , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE 1997 Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr).

[8]  José R. Dorronsoro,et al.  Neural fraud detection in credit card operations , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[9]  Salvatore J. Stolfo,et al.  Distributed data mining in credit card fraud detection , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[10]  Niall M. Adams,et al.  Comparing classifiers when the misallocation costs are uncertain , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Niall M. Adams,et al.  The impact of changing populations on classifier performance , 1999, KDD '99.

[12]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An introduction to Support Vector Machines , 2000 .

[13]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[14]  J. Stuart Aitken,et al.  Multiple algorithms for fraud detection , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[15]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[16]  D. Hand,et al.  Idiot's Bayes—Not So Stupid After All? , 2001 .

[17]  D. Hand,et al.  Unsupervised Profiling Methods for Fraud Detection , 2002 .

[18]  David J. Hand,et al.  Statistical fraud detection: A review , 2002 .

[19]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[20]  Chang-Tien Lu,et al.  Survey of fraud detection techniques , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 2004.

[21]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  Adaptive Fraud Detection , 1997, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[22]  D. J. Hand,et al.  Good practice in retail credit scorecard assessment , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  David J. Hand,et al.  Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress , 2006, math/0606441.

[24]  Tao Guo,et al.  Neural data mining for credit card fraud detection , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[25]  DJ Hand,et al.  Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..