In vivo proton beam range verification using spine MRI changes.

PURPOSE In proton therapy, uncertainty in the location of the distal dose edge can lead to cautious treatment plans that reduce the dosimetric advantage of protons. After radiation exposure, vertebral bone marrow undergoes fatty replacement that is visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This presents an exciting opportunity to observe radiation dose distribution in vivo. We used quantitative spine MRI changes to precisely detect the distal dose edge in proton radiation patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS We registered follow-up T1-weighted MRI images to planning computed tomography scans from 10 patients who received proton spine irradiation. A radiation dose-MRI signal intensity curve was created using the lateral beam penumbra in the sacrum. This curve was then used to measure range errors in the lumbar spine. RESULTS In the lateral penumbra, there was an increase in signal intensity with higher dose throughout the full range of 0-37.5 Gy (RBE). In the distal fall-off region, the beam sometimes appeared to penetrate farther than planned. The mean overshoot in 10 patients was 1.9 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.1 mm), on the order of the uncertainties inherent to our range verification method. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated in vivo proton range verification using posttreatment spine MRI changes. Our analysis suggests the presence of a systematic overshoot of a few millimeters in some proton spine treatments, but the range error does not exceed the uncertainty incorporated into the treatment planning margin. It may be possible to extend our technique to MRI sequences that show early bone marrow changes, enabling adaptive treatment modification.

[1]  Wayne D. Newhauser,et al.  International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 78: Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Proton-beam Therapy , 2009 .

[2]  M Bues,et al.  Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Focal fat deposition in axial bone marrow: MR characteristics. , 1987, Radiology.

[4]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Female pelvic bone marrow: serial MR imaging before, during, and after radiation therapy. , 1995, Radiology.

[5]  H. Paganetti Calculation of the spatial variation of relative biological effectiveness in a therapeutic proton field for eye treatment. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Y. Itai,et al.  Changes in the liver parenchyma after proton beam radiotherapy: evaluation with MR imaging. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Torunn I Yock,et al.  Physiologic and radiographic evidence of the distal edge of the proton beam in craniospinal irradiation. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  BioImage Suite: An integrated medical image analysis suite: An update. , 2006, The insight journal.

[9]  E. Weinberger,et al.  Hematopoietic marrow regeneration in pediatric patients undergoing spinal irradiation: MR depiction. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  W. Yuh,et al.  Radiation-induced changes in MR signal intensity and contrast enhancement of lumbosacral vertebrae: do changes occur only inside the radiation therapy field? , 2002, Radiology.

[11]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Early and late bone-marrow changes after irradiation: MR evaluation. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  C D Claussen,et al.  Normal bone marrow in the sacrum of young adults: differences between the sexes seen on chemical-shift MR imaging. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H. Tsujii,et al.  ICRU Report No. 78, Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy. , 2007 .

[14]  Zuofeng Li,et al.  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Proton-Beam Therapy , 2009 .

[15]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Till,et al.  The sensitivity of cells from normal mouse bone marrow to gamma radiation in vitro and in vivo. , 1962, Radiation research.

[17]  G T Chen,et al.  Degradation of the Bragg peak due to inhomogeneities. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..