Impact of implantoplasty on strength of the implant-abutment complex.

PURPOSE Implantoplasty, a procedure that is done to smooth contaminated implant surfaces, has been used in the treatment of peri-implantitis. It reduces the implant diameter, which might compromise the implant's strength. This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the effect of implantoplasty on implant strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two tapered implants were used; half were 3.75 mm in diameter (narrow) and the other half were 4.7 mm in diameter (wide). All implants were connected to 20-degree angled abutments. The apical half of each implant was embedded in acrylic resin. Eight 3.75-mm- and eight 4.7-mm-diameter implants were randomly assigned to receive implantoplasty. The remaining implants did not receive implantoplasty (control group). Implantoplasty was performed with a series of diamond and polishing burs. The specimens were then loaded 30 degrees off-axis in a universal testing machine until fracture failure occurred. Bending and fracture strength values were recorded and analyzed statistically (α = .05). The fractured surfaces were evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS All narrow implants failed by fracture at the implant platform. The mean bending strength of narrow implants was statistically significantly reduced by implantoplasty (511.4 ± 55.9 N versus 613.9 ± 42.8 N). Implantoplasty did not affect the strength of wide implants; fracture failures occurred at the abutment screw. The fracture mode was ductile and the crack growth was oblique in direction, indicating complex stress distribution and concentration under loading. CONCLUSION Within the limits of this study, implantoplasty appeared to weaken the strength of narrower implants. Therefore, this procedure should be performed with caution on narrower, freestanding implants that are subject to greater occlusal force (eg, posterior regions). Validation of these results is needed for different implant systems.

[1]  D. Rittel,et al.  Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part II: failure analysis. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[2]  D. Rittel,et al.  Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[3]  P. Coelho,et al.  Effect of microthread presence and restoration design (screw versus cemented) in dental implant reliability and failure modes. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Managing peri-implant bone loss: current understanding. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[5]  S. Esfandiari,et al.  How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Biomechanical implant treatment complications: a systematic review of clinical studies of implants with at least 1 year of functional loading. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  M. Stiesch,et al.  Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[8]  Francisco C L Barbi,et al.  Osseointegrated implant fracture: causes and treatment. , 2011, The Journal of oral implantology.

[9]  Hiok Chai Quek,et al.  Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  I. Polyzois,et al.  How do implant surface characteristics influence peri-implant disease? , 2011, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[11]  K. Tan,et al.  Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Impact of defect configuration on the clinical outcome following surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  Bilal El Masoud,et al.  Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns. , 2010, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[14]  I. Polyzois,et al.  Re-osseointegration on previously contaminated surfaces: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Immediate restoration of small-diameter implants in cases of partial posterior edentulism: a 4-year case series. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  Nicola U Zitzmann,et al.  Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  L. Heitz‐Mayfield Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  Noel Claffey,et al.  Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  Noel Claffey,et al.  Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part II: radiographic outcome. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Therapy of peri‐implantitis with resective surgery , 2005 .

[22]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Light and scanning electron microscopic report of four fractured implants. , 1998, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants.

[23]  B Rangert,et al.  Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.