Elucidating Model Inadequacies in a Cloud Parameterization by Use of an Ensemble-Based Calibration Framework

Every cloud parameterization contains structural model errors. The source of these errors is difficult to pinpoint because cloud parameterizations contain nonlinearities and feedbacks. To elucidate these model inadequacies, this paper uses a general-purpose ensemble parameter estimation technique. In principle, the technique is applicable to any parameterization that contains a number of adjustable coefficients. It optimizes or calibrates parameter values by attempting to match predicted fields to reference datasets. Rather than striving to find the single best set of parameter values, the output is instead an ensemble of parameter sets. This ensemble provides a wealth of information. In particular, it can help uncover model deficiencies and structural errors that might not otherwise be easily revealed. The calibration technique is applied to an existing single-column model (SCM) that parameterizes boundary layer clouds. The SCM is a higher-order turbulence closure model. It is closed using a multivariate probability density function (PDF) that represents subgrid-scale variability. Reference datasets are provided by large-eddy simulations (LES) of a variety of cloudy boundary layers. The calibration technique locates some model errors in the SCM. As a result, empirical modifications are suggested. These modifications are evaluated with independent datasets and found to lead to an overall improvement in the SCM’s performance.

[1]  G. Evensen.  Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[2]  W. Cotton,et al.  Data Assimilation into a LES Model: Retrieval of IFN and CCN Concentrations , 2005 .

[3]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of single-column model simulations of a nocturnal stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer , 2005 .

[4]  Chris Snyder,et al.  Ensemble Kalman Filter Assimilation of Fixed Screen-Height Observations in a Parameterized PBL , 2005 .

[5]  V. Larson,et al.  Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .

[6]  D. Randall,et al.  Conditional instability of the first kind upside-down. [in stratocumulus clouds] , 1980 .

[7]  K.,et al.  Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli under a Strong Inversion , 2001 .

[8]  D. Lilly,et al.  Dynamics and chemistry of marine stratocumulus - DYCOMS II , 2003 .

[9]  W. Cotton,et al.  Small-Scale and Mesoscale Variability in Cloudy Boundary Layers: Joint Probability Density Functions , 2002 .

[10]  James D. Annan,et al.  Parameter estimation in an intermediate complexity earth system model using an ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[11]  Fuqing Zhang,et al.  Ensemble-based simultaneous state and parameter estimation in a two-dimensional sea-breeze model , 2006 .

[12]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation of a land surface model: A case study using data from Cabauw, Netherlands , 2003 .

[13]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A Large Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2003 .

[14]  Jean-Christophe Golaz,et al.  Large‐eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land , 2002 .

[15]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Model Results , 2002 .

[16]  Fuqing Zhang,et al.  Ensemble‐based simultaneous state and parameter estimation with MM5 , 2006 .

[17]  Dusanka Zupanski,et al.  Model Error Estimation Employing an Ensemble Data Assimilation Approach , 2006 .

[18]  C. Bretherton,et al.  An intercomparison of radiatively driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models , 1996 .

[19]  J. Deardorff.  Cloud Top Entrainment Instability , 1980 .

[20]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  From Statistics to Neural Networks: Theory and Pattern Recognition Applications , 1996 .

[21]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  An Efficient Stochastic Bayesian Approach to Optimal Parameter and Uncertainty Estimation for Climate Model Predictions , 2004 .

[22]  Elie Bienenstock,et al.  Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma , 1992, Neural Computation.

[23]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[24]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[25]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Evaluation of Large-Eddy Simulations via Observations of Nocturnal Marine Stratocumulus , 2005 .

[26]  John Moody,et al.  Prediction Risk and Architecture Selection for Neural Networks , 1994 .

[27]  Julia C. Hargreaves,et al.  Parameter estimation in an atmospheric GCM using the Ensemble , 2005 .

[28]  J. Golaz,et al.  Coamps®-Les: Model Evaluation and Analysis of Second-and Third-Moment Vertical Velocity Budgets , 2005 .

[29]  Kerry Emanuel,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Convection Scheme for Use in Climate Models , 1999 .

[30]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[31]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description , 2002 .