Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?

One key issue for any computational model of visual word recognition is the choice of an input coding scheme for assigning letter position. Recent research has shown that transposed-letter similarity effects occur even when the transposed letters are not adjacent (caniso-casino; Perea & Lupker, 2004, JML). In the present study we conducted two single-presentation lexical decision experiments to examine whether transposed-letter effects occur at a syllable level. We tested two types of nonwords: (1) nonwords created by transposing two internal CV syllables (PRIVEMARA; the base word is primavera, the Spanish for spring) and (2) nonwords created by transposing two adjacent bigrams that do not form a syllable (PRIMERAVA). We also created the appropriate orthographic control conditions, in which the critical letters were replaced instead of being switched. Results showed that the transposition of two syllables or two adjacent bigrams produced a quite robust (and similar) transposed-letter effect. Thus, transposed-letter effects seem to occur at an early orthographic, graphemic level, rather than at a syllable level. We examine the implications of the observed results for the input coding schemes in visual word recognition.

[1]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[2]  J. Grainger,et al.  Sequential Effects of Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Psychological science.

[3]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllable Frequency and Visual Word Recognition in Spanish , 1993 .

[4]  I. Fraga,et al.  Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision , 2006, Brain and Language.

[5]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano , 1995 .

[7]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[8]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? , 2004 .

[10]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[13]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[15]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002 .

[17]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[18]  K. Rayner,et al.  The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading , 2001 .

[19]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[20]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Separable processing of consonants and vowels , 2000, Nature.

[21]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Syllable errors from naturalistic slips of the tongue in Mandarin Chinese , 2000 .

[22]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[23]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[24]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[26]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[27]  Douglas L. Chute,et al.  Accurate millisecond timing on Apple’s Macintosh using Drexel’s MilliTimer , 1986 .

[28]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition , 2004 .

[30]  C. Whitney.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Manuel Perea,et al.  ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  David M. Lane,et al.  PsychLib: A library of machine language routines for controlling psychology experiments on the Apple Macintosh computer , 1987 .

[33]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English , 1995 .

[35]  D. Zagar,et al.  Similarity in Visual Word Recognition: The Effect of Syllabic Neighborood in French , 2002 .

[36]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: Theturple effect , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Marcela Peña,et al.  ON THE DIFFERENT ROLES OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS IN SPEECH PROCESSING AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2003 .

[38]  S. M. Chambers.  Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[39]  S. Andrews.  Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[40]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .