Scientometric analysis of social science and science disciplines in a developing nation: a case study of Pakistan in the last decade

Our study is a scientometric analysis of research publications of science and social science disciplines in Pakistan during 2009–2018. The study examines 2000 published articles belonging to 50 research scholars of different disciplines. This analysis is conducted on three different levels: researcher level, field level and domain level. In this paper we discuss readability scores, title formats, single and multiple authorships of articles, citation rates, publication rates over time, the research contribution of both genders and the impact of PhD institution of authors in research publications. The IR features like number of words, sentence length and readability scores are extracted. The results indicate that more research is being conducted in science disciplines as compared to social sciences. It also appears that the readability scores of authors changed over time, and Science articles have higher readability scores compared to Social Science articles. Moreover, title formats are observed to effect citation rates. Titles tend to use more colons over time; and the use of simple sentences as titles is more than 50%, while use of question marks is below 3%, the rest are titles with colons. The citation rates also appear to increase due to co-authorship. Male researchers contribute more to research activities in science disciplines while in social science the ratio is almost equal while PhD institutes appear to influence the performance of researcher slightly. Finally, it is observed that the publication rates of Science disciplines are much higher than Social Science articles, depicting that the growth of Science disciplines is more rapid in Pakistan.

[1]  Dimitar Todorovsky Follow-up study: on the working time budget of a university teacher. 45 years self-observation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[2]  H. T. Eddy The characteristic curves of composition. , 1887, Science.

[3]  James Hartley,et al.  Writing through time: longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  A comparison of journal similarity across six disciplines using citing discipline analysis , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[5]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? , 2004, Scientometrics.

[6]  Michael Gibbert,et al.  What makes a ‘good’ title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science , 2016, Scientometrics.

[7]  James Hartley,et al.  What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons , 2005, Scientometrics.

[8]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Somnath Banerjee,et al.  Automatic Author Profiling Based on Linguistic and Stylistic Features Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013 , 2013, CLEF.

[10]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Lee Gillam Readability for Author Profiling? Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013 , 2013, CLEF.

[12]  G. Zipf Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language , 2014 .

[13]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Effects of Age and Gender on Blogging , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs.

[14]  Efstathios Stamatatos,et al.  A survey of modern authorship attribution methods , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[16]  Mamun Habib,et al.  An Academic Odyssey , 2013 .

[17]  James Hartley,et al.  An academic odyssey: writing over time , 2015, Scientometrics.

[18]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.

[19]  Benno Stein,et al.  Overview of the 3rd Author Profiling Task at PAN 2015 , 2015, CLEF.

[20]  José Palazzo Moreira de Oliveira,et al.  Using Simple Content Features for the Author Profiling Task Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013 , 2013, CLEF.

[21]  Bagher Larijani,et al.  Scientometric study of academic publications on antioxidative herbal medicines in type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2016, Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.

[22]  Eduardo G. Altmann,et al.  Using text analysis to quantify the similarity and evolution of scientific disciplines , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[23]  Bhaskar Mukherjee,et al.  Short and amusing: The relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Paula G Acuña,et al.  Scientometric Mapping of Social Science Studies in East Asia and the Philippines , 2017 .

[25]  José Palazzo Moreira de Oliveira,et al.  Examining Multiple Features for Author Profiling , 2014, J. Inf. Data Manag..

[26]  Benno Stein,et al.  Overview of the Author Profiling Task at PAN 2013 , 2013, CLEF.

[27]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  F. Habibzadeh,et al.  Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? Cross-sectional study of 22 scientific journals. , 2010, Croatian medical journal.

[29]  George K. Mikros,et al.  Authorship Attribution in Greek Tweets Using Author's Multilevel N-Gram Profiles , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Analyzing Microtext.

[30]  James Hartley Longitudinal Studies of the Effects of New Technologies on Writing: Two Case Studies , 2007 .

[31]  Güleda Doğan,et al.  Evaluation of Scientific Disciplines in Turkey: A Citation Analysis Study , 2013 .