A Negative Actor Engagement Scale for Online Knowledge-Sharing Platforms

Prior research shows that negative engagement is conceptually different from positive engagement, and necessitates further understanding and measurement instruments. This study reports a series of four studies leading to conceptualization, development, and validation of a negative actor engagement scale for online knowledge-sharing platforms. An online learning service platform Piazza is chosen as the research context, where learners engage intensively in knowledge-sharing with one another as well as instructors. We conceptualize negative engagement as actors’ negative engagement dispositions (i.e., negative emotions and cognitions) during interactions on the platform. Negative engagement disposition is shown to be a second-order formative construct comprising four first-order reflective constructs—annoyance, social anxiety, failed expectations, and futility. The relationship between negative engagement disposition and its behavioral consequence of negative word-of-mouth is established. This is the first study to conceptualize and operationalize negative actor engagement.

[1]  Tze-Hsien Liao,et al.  Developing an antecedent model of knowledge sharing intention in virtual communities , 2016, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[2]  E. Tronick,et al.  The impact of maternal anxiety disorder on mother-infant interaction in the postpartum period , 2018, PloS one.

[3]  Linda C. Li,et al.  Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[4]  Wenjie Chen,et al.  Factors affecting the knowledge sharing attitude of hotel service personnel , 2012 .

[5]  P. van Esch,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MARKETING SIMULATIONS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC OUTCOMES , 2020 .

[6]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation , 2005 .

[7]  Tai-Kuei Yu,et al.  Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Paula Anthony-McMann,et al.  Exploring Different Operationalizations of Employee Engagement and Their Relationships with Workplace Stress and Burnout Among IT Professionals in Community Hospitals , 2014 .

[9]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Keh-chung Lin,et al.  Parent-child interaction of mothers with depression and their children with ADHD. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[11]  Elina Jaakkola,et al.  Actor Engagement in Networks: Defining the Conceptual Domain , 2019, Journal of Service Research.

[12]  P. Esch,et al.  Justification of a Qualitative Methodology to Investigate the Emerging Concept: The Dimensions of Religion as Underpinning Constructs for Mass Media Social Marketing Campaigns , 2013 .

[13]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Rivadávia Correa Drummond de Alvarenga Neto,et al.  Beyond the ba: managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  Olivier Furrer,et al.  Conceptualising and Measuring the Equity of Online Brands , 2006 .

[16]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[17]  Brand Experience: What is It? How is it Measured? Does it Affect Loyalty? , 2009 .

[18]  Yunus Alkis,et al.  Development and Validation of Social Anxiety Scale for Social Media Users , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[20]  Jodie Conduit,et al.  Social Brand Engagement: How Orientation Events Engage Students with the University , 2018 .

[21]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[22]  I. Karpen,et al.  Student Engagement: A Multiple Layer Phenomenon , 2016 .

[23]  Victoria L. Crittenden,et al.  Digital Disruption: The Transdisciplinary Future of Marketing Education , 2019, Journal of Marketing Education.

[24]  Hadi Al‐Abrrow,et al.  The impact of self‐efficacy on employees' ability to accept new technology in an Iraqi university , 2019 .

[25]  Sherry J. Holladay,et al.  The negative communication dynamic , 2007 .

[26]  L. Bahrick,et al.  A systems view of mother-infant face-to-face communication. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[27]  Dang Nguyen The University in a World of Digital Technologies: Tensions and Challenges , 2018 .

[28]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Advancing formative measurement models , 2008 .

[29]  P. Hunter-Jones The Continuum of Learner Disengagement , 2012 .

[30]  P. Kerig Parenting and Family Systems , 2019, Handbook of Parenting.

[31]  Gianfranco Walsh,et al.  Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation , 2007 .

[32]  P. Schilder,et al.  The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces , 1940 .

[33]  Steve Dix Student Advancement in Tertiary Learning Environments: Shift from the obstacle course to the dancefloor , 2018 .

[34]  M. Leary Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.

[35]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  C. Plewa,et al.  Collective engagement in organizational settings , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[37]  K. Nelson,et al.  Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success , 2018 .

[38]  Katrien Verleye,et al.  Managing Engagement Behaviors in a Network of Customers and Stakeholders , 2014 .

[39]  Andrew J. Czaplewski,et al.  eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty , 2006 .

[40]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[41]  Michael C. Rodriguez,et al.  Exploring the Student Engagement Instrument and Career Perceptions with College Students , 2012 .

[42]  Henning Rode,et al.  To share or not to share: the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on knowledge-sharing in enterprise social media platforms , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[43]  Ruben Chumpitaz Cáceres,et al.  Not always co-creation: introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic , 2010 .

[44]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[45]  Daniel J. Mundfrom,et al.  Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses , 2005 .

[46]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Part I Commentary: So What Is Student Engagement Anyway? , 2012 .

[47]  P. Maglio,et al.  Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation , 2016 .

[48]  J. Füller,et al.  The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities , 2013 .

[49]  Line Ricard,et al.  e-WOM Scale: Word-of-Mouth Measurement Scale for e-Services Context* , 2010 .

[50]  M. Uncles Directions in Higher Education: A Marketing Perspective , 2018 .

[51]  Jari Lavonen,et al.  Integrating the light and dark sides of student engagement using person-oriented and situation-specific approaches , 2016 .

[52]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[53]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions , 2010 .

[55]  K. Nordahl,et al.  Family concordance and gender differences in parent-child structured interaction at 12 months. , 2014, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[56]  P. Monti,et al.  Enhancing Substance Abuse Treatment Engagement in Incarcerated Adolescents. , 2006, Psychological services.