Multi-objective aerodynamic design with user preference using truncated expected hypervolume improvement

Multi-objective optimization in aerodynamic design plays an important role in capturing the trade-off and useful knowledge that would be useful for real-world design processes. In the preliminary design phase, aerodynamic designers usually have an interest in focusing the optimization process in a certain direction of interest. To this end, we propose the use of user preference multi-objective Bayesian global optimization (MOBGO) for aerodynamic design using truncated expected hypervolume improvement (TEHVI). Taking into account the apriori knowledge of objective functions, TEHVI acts as an infill criterion to search for the optimal solutions based on the Kriging models in MOBGO. In TEHVI-MOBGO, the first step is to obtain a coarse approximation of the Pareto front in order to capture the general trend and trade off using standard EHVI; following this step, TEHVI is then applied to focus the search on a defined region of interest. We demonstrate the capabilities and usefulness of TEHVI method on the design optimization of an inviscid transonic wing and a viscous transonic airfoil in order to minimize the drag coefficient and absolute value of pitching moment, which leads to a reduced fuel burn and easier control characteristic.

[1]  Shigeru Obayashi,et al.  Updating Kriging Surrogate Models Based on the Hypervolume Indicator in Multi-Objective Optimization , 2013 .

[2]  Thomas D. Economon,et al.  Stanford University Unstructured (SU 2 ): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design , 2013 .

[3]  Pramudita Satria Palar,et al.  Benchmarking Multi-Objective Bayesian Global Optimization Strategies for Aerodynamic Design , 2018 .

[4]  Heike Trautmann,et al.  Preference-Based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Using Desirabilities , 2010, PPSN.

[5]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come? , 2014 .

[6]  Hao Wang,et al.  A Multicriteria Generalization of Bayesian Global Optimization , 2016, Advances in Stochastic and Deterministic Global Optimization.

[7]  Robert Carrese,et al.  Benefits of Incorporating Designer Preferences Within a Multi-Objective Airfoil Design Framework , 2011 .

[8]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Preference incorporation to solve many-objective airfoil design problems , 2011, 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[9]  O. Amoignon,et al.  Mesh Deformation using Radial Basis Functions for Gradient-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2007 .

[10]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Preference-based multiobjective optimization using truncated expected hypervolume improvement , 2016, 2016 12th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD).

[11]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  On Using Decision Maker Preferences with ParEGO , 2017, EMO.

[12]  Carlos M. Fonseca,et al.  Computing 3-D Expected Hypervolume Improvement and Related Integrals in Asymptotically Optimal Time , 2017, EMO.

[13]  Kaifeng Yang Multi-objective Bayesian global optimization for continuous problems and applications , 2017 .

[14]  Hossein Zare-Behtash,et al.  State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Truncated expected hypervolume improvement: Exact computation and application , 2016, 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[16]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Faster Exact Algorithms for Computing Expected Hypervolume Improvement , 2015, EMO.

[17]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  A comprehensive preference-based optimization framework with application to high-lift aerodynamic design , 2012 .

[18]  Stefan Roth,et al.  Covariance Matrix Adaptation for Multi-objective Optimization , 2007, Evolutionary Computation.

[19]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Benchmarking a BI-population CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 function testbed , 2009, GECCO '09.