Same Story, Different Story

Differences in people’s beliefs can substantially impact their interpretation of a series of events. In this functional MRI study, we manipulated subjects’ beliefs, leading two groups of subjects to interpret the same narrative in different ways. We found that responses in higher-order brain areas—including the default-mode network, language areas, and subsets of the mirror neuron system—tended to be similar among people who shared the same interpretation, but different from those of people with an opposing interpretation. Furthermore, the difference in neural responses between the two groups at each moment was correlated with the magnitude of the difference in the interpretation of the narrative. This study demonstrates that brain responses to the same event tend to cluster together among people who share the same views.

[1]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Ranganath,et al.  Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Dissociating Modality-Specific and Supramodal Neural Systems for Action Understanding , 2012 .

[7]  James Dungan,et al.  Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  Robert P. Spunt,et al.  Validating the Why/How contrast for functional MRI studies of Theory of Mind , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  E. Maguire,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Jung-Beeman Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Juan Manuel Contreras,et al.  Neural evidence that three dimensions organize mental state representation: Rationality, social impact, and valence , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[14]  R. Mar The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[16]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[18]  R. Saxe Against simulation: the argument from error , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Christopher J. Honey,et al.  Contextual Alignment of Cognitive and Neural Dynamics , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives , 2014, NeuroImage.

[21]  James V. Haxby,et al.  The Well-Tempered Social Brain , 2009, Psychological science.

[22]  Aaron C. Koralek,et al.  Two Takes on the Social Brain: A Comparison of Theory of Mind Tasks , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[24]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an fMRI study , 2022 .

[26]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Mentalizing under Uncertainty: Dissociated Neural Responses to Ambiguous and Unambiguous Mental State Inferences , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  C. Keysers,et al.  Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[29]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[30]  M. Just,et al.  Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[31]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[32]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Saxe,et al.  Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  H. Cantril,et al.  They saw a game: a case study. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[36]  Steven L. Small,et al.  Interpretation-mediated changes in neural activity during language comprehension , 2011, NeuroImage.

[37]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Neural Representations of Emotion Are Organized around Abstract Event Features , 2015, Current Biology.

[38]  Lindsey J. Powell,et al.  It's the Thought That Counts , 2006, Psychological science.

[39]  Tokiko Harada,et al.  Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm , 2012, Cortex.

[40]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse , 1977 .

[41]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  Emotional and Temporal Aspects of Situation Model Processing during Text Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior , 2012, NeuroImage.

[43]  J. Perner,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Fractionating Theory of Mind: a Meta-analysis of Functional Brain Imaging Studies , 2022 .

[44]  Juan Antonio Hernández Tamames,et al.  Brain activation in discourse comprehension: A 3t fMRI study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[45]  Ivan Toni,et al.  On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain” , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..