Independent Evaluations of IMRT through the Use of an Anthropomorphic Phantom

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has gained rapid and wide-spread acceptance in the radiation oncology community for its ability to create dose distributions that conform to the convoluted shapes of many tumors. It is a complicated treatment technique, for which quality assurance procedures are correspondingly complicated and labor intensive. Several of the cooperative cancer study groups that conduct clinical trials under the auspices of the National Cancer Institute have required participating institutions to seek credentialing before enrolling patients in trials involving IMRT. The Radiological Physics Center has conducted such credentialing programs through the use of anthropomorphic phantoms that evaluate the planning and delivery of IMRT. The experience obtained through the irradiation of the phantoms by a number of institutions demonstrates that institutions vary significantly in their ability to deliver doses and dose distributions that agree with their own treatment plans.

[1]  Icru.,et al.  Phantoms and Computational Models in Therapy, Diagnosis and Protection , 1992 .

[2]  D. Low,et al.  Phantoms for IMRT dose distribution measurement and treatment verification. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Comparison of dual energy detector system performance. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  J. Galvin,et al.  Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 55. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 1998, Medical physics.

[7]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  A. Boyer,et al.  Tissue Inhomogeneity Corrections for Megavoltage Photon Beams , 2004 .

[9]  G. Starkschall,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  G. Ibbott,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic cancers: pitfalls, hazards, and cautions to be considered. , 2006, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[11]  G. Ibbott,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Tsai,et al.  Dosimetric verification of the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 92 patients. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  P. Carrasco,et al.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  A L Boyer,et al.  Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. , 1994, Medical physics.

[16]  Walter Grant,et al.  The evolution of quality assurance for intensity- modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): sequential tomotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  R J Gastorf,et al.  Mailable TLD system for photon and electron therapy beams. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P. Xia,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  C. Ling,et al.  Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Christopher G Willett,et al.  Quantification of respiration-induced abdominal tumor motion and its impact on IMRT dose distributions. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. , 1997, Medical physics.

[23]  D.-A. Radford,et al.  Design of an anthropomorphic intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance phantom , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[24]  P. Metcalfe,et al.  Verification of lung dose in an anthropomorphic phantom calculated by the collapsed cone convolution method. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  I. Rosen,et al.  Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: a joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Qiuwen Wu,et al.  Potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate doses to head-and-neck cancers: what is the maximal dose? , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  J. Roeske,et al.  Can intensity-modulated radiation therapy replace brachytherapy in the management of cervical cancer? Counterpoint. , 2002, Brachytherapy.

[28]  S Mutic,et al.  Abutment region dosimetry for sequential arc IMRT delivery. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  K. Alektiar.  Can intensity-modulated radiation therapy replace brachytherapy in the management of cervical cancer? Point. , 2002, Brachytherapy.

[30]  L. Dawson,et al.  Quality of life after parotid-sparing IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  T LoSasso,et al.  Dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated fields. , 1996, Medical physics.

[32]  W F Hanson,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters. , 1992, Medical physics.