Use of universally offered family planning services – a cohort study in the city of Vantaa, Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Latvala,et al. Associations between hormonal contraception use, sociodemographic factors and mental health: a nationwide, register-based, matched case–control study , 2020, BMJ Open.
[2] L. Alkema,et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. , 2020, The Lancet. Global health.
[3] M. Gissler,et al. Predictors of choosing long-acting reversible contraceptive methods when provided free-of-charge - a prospective cohort study in finland. , 2020, Contraception.
[4] Philipp Ueffing,et al. Sexual activity by marital status and age: a comparative perspective , 2019, Journal of Biosocial Science.
[5] M. Gissler,et al. How reliable are health registers? Registration of induced abortions and sterilizations in Finland , 2018, Informatics for health & social care.
[6] M. Gissler,et al. Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Free of Charge, Method Initiation, and Abortion Rates in Finland , 2018, American journal of public health.
[7] Ayana Douglas-Hall,et al. The sexual and reproductive health of foreign-born women in the United States☆ , 2018, Contraception.
[8] S. Baral,et al. Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, among Currently Married Young (15-24 Years) Women in Nepal , 2017 .
[9] M. Jalovaara,et al. Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries , 2017, European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie.
[10] A. I. Hijas-Gómez,et al. A systematic review of the use of health services by immigrants and native populations , 2016, Public Health Reviews.
[11] L. Finer,et al. Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011 , 2016 .
[12] Heini Väisänen. The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland , 2015, Population studies.
[13] J. Frost,et al. Return on Investment: A Fuller Assessment of the Benefits and Cost Savings of the US Publicly Funded Family Planning Program , 2014, The Milbank quarterly.
[14] R. Sund. Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: A systematic review , 2012, Scandinavian journal of public health.
[15] J. Haukka. Finnish health and social welfare registers in epidemiological research , 2009 .
[16] Anne M Johnson,et al. Use of contraceptive services in Britain: findings from the second National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal–2) , 2009, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.
[17] J. Frost,et al. The Impact of Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinic Services on Unintended Pregnancies and Government Cost Savings , 2008, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.
[18] J. Frost,et al. Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004. , 2007, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.
[19] L. Finer,et al. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health , 2002 .
[20] E. Hemminki,et al. Quality of contraceptive services in Finland. , 1997, Quality in health care : QHC.
[21] Frost Jj,et al. Publicly funded family planning clinics in 2015: Patterns and trends in service delivery practices and protocols. , 2016 .
[22] E. Clayton,et al. Overview of Family Planning in the United States , 2009 .
[23] B. Shane. Family planning saves lives. , 1992, Integration.