Use of universally offered family planning services – a cohort study in the city of Vantaa, Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland

Aims: Knowledge about the women reached by public family planning services is scarce. The means for provision of these services that are pivotal for women’s health and empowerment varies globally. In Finland, family planning services are offered free of charge, but often separately for different age groups. City of Vantaa offers these services for all female residents without age limit. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of the women using public family planning services. Methods: We assessed the sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics of women aged 15–44 using (n = 11,790) and not using (n = 42,931) these services in 2013–2014. We obtained adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for service use by multivariate logistic regression. Results: Women under 35 years of age had higher odds of service use compared with those over 35 (AORs ranging from 2.79 [95%CI 2.54–3.07] for 15–19 year-olds to 1.81 [95%CI 1.69–1.95] for 30–34 year-olds). Women speaking a foreign native language used services less when aged under 30 and more when aged 35–44 compared with women speaking the national languages. Women with a history of delivery, induced abortion or sexually transmitted infections, or with a lower socioeconomic or educational status were more likely to use the services. Conclusions: Young women in general were more likely to use free-of-charge family planning services. In contrast, young women speaking a foreign native language were underrepresented among service users. It is important to recognise and actively reach underrepresented groups, such as young women with a foreign background, to optimise equal access to family planning services.

[1]  A. Latvala,et al.  Associations between hormonal contraception use, sociodemographic factors and mental health: a nationwide, register-based, matched case–control study , 2020, BMJ Open.

[2]  L. Alkema,et al.  Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. , 2020, The Lancet. Global health.

[3]  M. Gissler,et al.  Predictors of choosing long-acting reversible contraceptive methods when provided free-of-charge - a prospective cohort study in finland. , 2020, Contraception.

[4]  Philipp Ueffing,et al.  Sexual activity by marital status and age: a comparative perspective , 2019, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[5]  M. Gissler,et al.  How reliable are health registers? Registration of induced abortions and sterilizations in Finland , 2018, Informatics for health & social care.

[6]  M. Gissler,et al.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Free of Charge, Method Initiation, and Abortion Rates in Finland , 2018, American journal of public health.

[7]  Ayana Douglas-Hall,et al.  The sexual and reproductive health of foreign-born women in the United States☆ , 2018, Contraception.

[8]  S. Baral,et al.  Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, among Currently Married Young (15-24 Years) Women in Nepal , 2017 .

[9]  M. Jalovaara,et al.  Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries , 2017, European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie.

[10]  A. I. Hijas-Gómez,et al.  A systematic review of the use of health services by immigrants and native populations , 2016, Public Health Reviews.

[11]  L. Finer,et al.  Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011 , 2016 .

[12]  Heini Väisänen The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland , 2015, Population studies.

[13]  J. Frost,et al.  Return on Investment: A Fuller Assessment of the Benefits and Cost Savings of the US Publicly Funded Family Planning Program , 2014, The Milbank quarterly.

[14]  R. Sund Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: A systematic review , 2012, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[15]  J. Haukka Finnish health and social welfare registers in epidemiological research , 2009 .

[16]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Use of contraceptive services in Britain: findings from the second National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal–2) , 2009, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[17]  J. Frost,et al.  The Impact of Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinic Services on Unintended Pregnancies and Government Cost Savings , 2008, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[18]  J. Frost,et al.  Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004. , 2007, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[19]  L. Finer,et al.  Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health , 2002 .

[20]  E. Hemminki,et al.  Quality of contraceptive services in Finland. , 1997, Quality in health care : QHC.

[21]  Frost Jj,et al.  Publicly funded family planning clinics in 2015: Patterns and trends in service delivery practices and protocols. , 2016 .

[22]  E. Clayton,et al.  Overview of Family Planning in the United States , 2009 .

[23]  B. Shane Family planning saves lives. , 1992, Integration.