Defining and Evaluating the Umbrella Species Concept for Conserving and Restoring Landscape Connectivity

Conserving or restoring landscape connectivity between patches of breeding habitat is a common strategy to protect threatened species from habitat fragmentation. By managing connectivity for some species, usually charismatic vertebrates, it is often assumed that these species will serve as conservation umbrellas for other species. We tested this assumption by developing a quantitative method to measure overlap in dispersal habitat of 3 threatened species-a bird (the umbrella), a butterfly, and a frog-inhabiting the same fragmented landscape. Dispersal habitat was determined with Circuitscape, which was parameterized with movement data collected for each species. Despite differences in natural history and breeding habitat, we found substantial overlap in the spatial distributions of areas important for dispersal of this suite of taxa. However, the intuitive umbrella species (the bird) did not have the highest overlap with other species in terms of the areas that supported connectivity. Nevertheless, we contend that when there are no irreconcilable differences between the dispersal habitats of species that cohabitate on the landscape, managing for umbrella species can help conserve or restore connectivity simultaneously for multiple threatened species with different habitat requirements.

[1]  Using Economic and Regulatory Incentives to Restore Endangered Species: Lessons Learned from Three New Programs , 2004 .

[2]  Jeffrey R Dunk,et al.  Evaluating reserves for species richness and representation in northern California , 2006 .

[3]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk , 1983, Oecologia.

[5]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Corridors Increase Plant Species Richness at Large Scales , 2006, Science.

[6]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[7]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool , 2004 .

[8]  P. Beier,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Karin Johst,et al.  Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance , 2002 .

[10]  G. Niemi,et al.  A critical analysis on the use of indicator species in management , 1997 .

[11]  Dispersal via stream corridors structures populations of the endangered St. Francis’ satyr butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii francisci) , 2012, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[12]  J. Walters,et al.  Social composition of destination territories and matrix habitat affect red-cockaded woodpecker dispersal† , 2012 .

[13]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[14]  N. Haddad,et al.  Distribution, Population Structure and Habitat Use of the Endangered Saint Francis Satyr Butterfly, Neonympha Mitchellii Francisci , 2008 .

[15]  William F Morris,et al.  The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal. , 2010, Ecology.

[16]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[17]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American Great Plains , 2013, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[18]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  A. Baur.  [Rezension von] T. Caro,Conservation by proxy: Indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and other surrogate species , 2011 .

[20]  Greg Baxter,et al.  Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation , 2007 .

[21]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  A Resistant‐Kernel Model of Connectivity for Amphibians that Breed in Vernal Pools , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  B. Martof.  Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia , 1980 .

[23]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  LOW-QUALITY HABITAT CORRIDORS AS MOVEMENT CONDUITS FOR TWO BUTTERFLY SPECIES , 2005 .

[24]  S. Andelman,et al.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  William R. Fields,et al.  How complex do models need to be to predict dispersal of threatened species through matrix habitats? , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  D. Rudolph,et al.  RED-COCKADED WOODPECKER FORAGING BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO MIDSTORY VEGETATION , 2002 .

[27]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 2012 .

[28]  Paul Beier,et al.  Where to Restore Ecological Connectivity? Detecting Barriers and Quantifying Restoration Benefits , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  G. Pasinelli,et al.  Inbreeding in red-cockaded woodpeckers: Effects of natal dispersal distance and territory location , 2006 .

[30]  Jeffrey R. Walters,et al.  Defining quality of red-cockaded woodpecker foraging habitat based on habitat use and fitness , 2002 .

[31]  Jeffrey A. Cardille,et al.  Applying Circuit Theory for Corridor Expansion and Management at Regional Scales: Tiling, Pinch Points, and Omnidirectional Connectivity , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Gonzalez,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem , 1998, Science.

[33]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[34]  Jeffrey R. Walters,et al.  The Red-cockaded Woodpecker: Surviving in a Fire-Maintained Ecosystem , 2001 .

[35]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  A NEW METHOD FOR SELECTION OF UMBRELLA SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING , 2000 .

[36]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[37]  Katherine J. LaJeunesse Connette,et al.  Conservation Biology , 2009, The Quarterly review of biology.

[38]  Steve A. Johnson,et al.  Terrestrial movements and habitat use of gopher frogs in longleaf pine forests: a comparative study of juveniles and adults , 2009 .

[39]  D. V. Lear,et al.  History and restoration of the longleaf pine-grassland ecosystem: Implications for species at risk , 2005 .

[40]  Aaron Moody,et al.  Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR USE BY DIVERSE TAXA , 2003 .

[42]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Using individual-based movement models to assess inter-patch connectivity for large carnivores in fragmented landscapes , 2013 .

[43]  J. Walters,et al.  Social influences on dispersal and the fat-tailed dispersal distribution in red-cockaded woodpeckers. , 2010 .

[44]  K. Beard,et al.  A Meta‐Analytic Review of Corridor Effectiveness , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.