The Group Discussion Effect

One of the most consistent findings in experimental social dilemmas research is the positive effect group discussion has on cooperative behavior. At a time when cooperation and consensus is critical to tackle global problems, ranging from debt to deforestation, understanding the dynamics of group discussion is a pressing need. Unfortunately, research investigating the underlying processes and implementation of the effect has been inconclusive. The authors present a critical review of existing explanations and integrate these perspectives into a single process model of group discussion, providing a more complete theoretical picture of how interrelated factors combine to facilitate discussion-induced cooperation. On the basis of this theoretical analysis, they consider complimentary approaches to the indirect and feasible implementation of group discussion. They argue that such strategies may overcome the barriers to direct discussion observed across a range of groups and organizations.

[1]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[2]  D. Balliet.  Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[3]  N. Kerr.  “Does My Contribution Really Matter?”: Efficacy in Social Dilemmas , 1996 .

[4]  Keith P. Sentis,et al.  Fairness and preference , 1979 .

[5]  C. Parks,et al.  Group Discussion as Affected by Number of Alternatives and by a Time Limit , 1995 .

[6]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood. , 1977 .

[7]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[8]  Group transformation: How demonstrability promotes intra-group cooperation in social dilemmas , 2010 .

[9]  L. Hulbert,et al.  The Effect of Group Decision Making on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2005 .

[10]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[11]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. D. Caldwell,et al.  Communication and sex effects in a five-person Prisoner's Dilemma Game. , 1976 .

[13]  Nicole L. Waters,et al.  A Jury of One: Opinion Formation, Conformity, and Dissent on Juries , 2009 .

[14]  Stephen M. Garcia,et al.  Crowded Minds : The Implicit Bystander Effect , 2002 .

[15]  S. Komorita,et al.  The Effects of Communication and Commitment in a Public Goods Social Dilemma , 1994 .

[16]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  From Thought to Action: Effects of Process-Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance , 1999 .

[17]  Kelly S. Bouas,et al.  Group Discussion and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 1996 .

[18]  S. Hinkle,et al.  Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach , 1989 .

[19]  Richard J. Crisp,et al.  Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes , 2007 .

[20]  S. Komorita,et al.  A model of the N-person dilemma-type game , 1976 .

[21]  S. Braver,et al.  Choices in Social Dilemmas , 1986 .

[22]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. , 1983 .

[23]  Lee Sproull,et al.  My partner is a real dog: cooperation with social agents , 1996, CSCW '96.

[24]  S. Komorita,et al.  Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction , 1995 .

[25]  D. Messick,et al.  Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. , 2002 .

[26]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Within- and between-group communication in intergroup competition for public goods☆ , 1989 .

[27]  Garrett Hardin,et al.  Extensions of "The Tragedy of the Commons" , 1998, Science.

[28]  R. Crisp,et al.  Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups , 2008 .

[29]  Mark Van Vugt,et al.  Community Identification Moderating the Impact of Financial Incentives in a Natural Social Dilemma: Water Conservation , 2001 .

[30]  Jeff Joireman,et al.  Structural Solutions to Social Dilemmas: A Field Study on Commuters’ Willingness to Fund Improvements in Public Transit1 , 2001 .

[31]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Group Performance in Collaborative and Social Dilemma Tasks: Progress and Prospects , 2008 .

[32]  C. Bicchieri,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: an experimental analysis , 2007 .

[33]  David M. Messick,et al.  Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma , 1987 .

[34]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Social explanation: The role of timing, set, and recall on subjective likelihood estimates. , 1983 .

[35]  C. Bicchieri.  The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms , 2005 .

[36]  F. Sistrunk,et al.  Communication Schedule and Cooperative Game Behavior. , 1971 .

[37]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .

[38]  Xiao-ping Chen.  The group-based binding pledge as a solution to public goods problems , 1996 .

[39]  John Orbell,et al.  Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. , 1988 .

[40]  David F. Sally.  Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 1995 .

[41]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[42]  N. Kerr,et al.  Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemma. , 1994 .

[43]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Anonymity and social control in social dilemmas. , 1999 .

[44]  John Orbell,et al.  Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience. , 1990 .

[45]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[46]  Joachim Weimann,et al.  The Effect of Communication Media on Cooperation , 2002 .

[47]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Social Decision Making : Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments , 2009 .

[48]  M. Deutsch.  Trust and suspicion , 1958 .

[49]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[50]  K. Brechner,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Social Traps. , 1977 .

[51]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Harnessing the imagination. Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[52]  John Orbell,et al.  Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. , 1989 .

[53]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[54]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[55]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Communication and Free-Riding Behavior: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism , 1988 .

[57]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[58]  David M. Messick,et al.  Social Traps and Temporal Traps , 1983 .

[59]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. , 1995 .

[60]  B. Fisher,et al.  Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making , 1970 .

[61]  R. Bales,et al.  Phases in group problem-solving. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[62]  Marcello Gallucci,et al.  “How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?”: Social exclusion and toleration for bad apples , 2009 .

[63]  S. Wheelan.  Facilitating Training Groups: A Guide to Leadership and Verbal Intervention Skills , 1990 .

[64]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[65]  Sherry L. Piezon,et al.  Online Groups and Social Loafing: Understanding Student-Group Interactions , 2005 .

[66]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[67]  Mike Woodcock,et al.  Team Development Manual , 1979 .

[68]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. , 1981 .

[69]  T. Pettigrew.  Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[70]  J. Carroll.  The Effect of Imagining an Event on Expectations for the Event: An Interpretation in Terms of the Availability Heuristic. , 1978 .

[71]  Parks,et al.  Discussion and Decision: The Interrelationship between Initial Preference Distribution and Group Discussion Content. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[72]  Arjaan Wit,et al.  The presentation of rewards and punishments in a simulated social dilemma. , 1990 .

[73]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment , 1998 .

[74]  Steven M. Drucker,et al.  The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments , 2000, CHI.

[75]  L. Felkins.  The Social Dilemmas , 2015 .

[76]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[77]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. , 1977 .

[78]  B. Rosen,et al.  Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behavior in the common interest. , 1974 .

[79]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  That Still, Small Voice: Commitment to Cooperate as an Internalized Versus a Social Norm , 1997 .

[80]  R. Crisp,et al.  Mental Simulations of Social Thought and Action , 2011 .