Triple-negative breast cancer: are we making headway at least?

The so-called triple-negative breast cancer, as defined by tumors that lack estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, has generated growing interest in recent years despite representing less than 20% of all breast cancers. These tumors constitute an important clinical challenge, as they do not respond to endocrine treatment and other targeted therapies. As a group they harbor an aggressive clinical phenotype with early development of visceral metastases and a poor long-term prognosis. While chemotherapy remains effective in triple-negative disease, research continues to further identify potential new targets based on phenotypical and molecular characteristics of these tumors. In this respect, the presence of a higher expression of different biomarkers including epidermal growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and Akt activation has led to a proliferation of clinical trials assessing the role of inhibitors to these pathways in triple-negative tumors. Moreover, the described overlap between triple-negative and basal-like tumors, and the similarities with tumors arising in the BRCA1 mutation carriers has offered potential therapeutic avenues for patients with these cancers including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and a focus on a higher sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy agents. Results from these trials have shown some benefit in small subgroups of patients, even in single-agent therapy, which reflects the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer and highlights the need for a further subclassification of these types of tumors for better prognosis identification and treatment individualization.

[1]  H. Cunliffe,et al.  Co-targeting of the PI3K pathway improves the response of BRCA1 deficient breast cancer cells to PARP1 inhibition. , 2012, Cancer letters.

[2]  Tanja Fehm,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  James A Young,et al.  Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Zhongyu Yuan,et al.  Classical CMF regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer may be more effective compared with anthracycline or taxane-based regimens , 2012, Medical Oncology.

[5]  E. Perez,et al.  RIBBON-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  S. Roman-Roman,et al.  801 ORAL High Throughput Molecular Analyses to Select Patients for Targeted Agents , 2011 .

[7]  X. Chen,et al.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  K Miller,et al.  A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  F. Holmes,et al.  Randomized, phase III study of adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) → docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) in high-risk early breast cancer: Exploratory Ki-67 analyses. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  F. André,et al.  Biology-driven phase II trials: what is the optimal model for molecular selection? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Fabrice Andre,et al.  Implications of personalized medicine—perspective from a cancer center , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  β-Catenin pathway activation in breast cancer is associated with triple-negative phenotype but not with CTNNB1 mutation , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[14]  Mark Yoffe,et al.  Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2011 .

[16]  A. Jukkola-Vuorinen,et al.  Abstract S4-1: FinXX Final 5-Year Analysis: Results of the Randomised, Open-Label, Phase III Trial in Medium-to-High Risk Early Breast Cancer , 2010 .

[17]  F. Holmes,et al.  Abstract S4-2: First Efficacy Results of a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study of Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Followed by Docetaxel with or without Capecitabine, in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer , 2010 .

[18]  Oleksiy Tsybrovskyy,et al.  Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations , 2010, Histopathology.

[19]  A. Ruíz,et al.  Adjuvant docetaxel for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Charles M Perou,et al.  Molecular stratification of triple-negative breast cancers. , 2010, The oncologist.

[21]  J. Baselga,et al.  Treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  C. Denkert,et al.  Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  Mark Robson,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Tutt,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[25]  Arlene Chan,et al.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  J. Lubiński,et al.  A phase II trial of trabectedin (T) in patients (pts) with HER2-positive and BRCA1/2 germ-line-mutated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). , 2010 .

[27]  A. Oza,et al.  Can we define tumors that will respond to PARP inhibitors? A phase II correlative study of olaparib in advanced serous ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010 .

[28]  H. Wildiers,et al.  Safety and efficacy of the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib (AZD2281) in combination with paclitaxel for the first- or second-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Results from the safety cohort of a phase I/II multicenter trial. , 2010 .

[29]  E. Winer,et al.  A phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT888) and temozolomide for metastatic breast cancer. , 2010 .

[30]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Treating triple-negative breast cancer by a combination of rapamycin and cyclophosphamide: an in vivo bioluminescence imaging study. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[31]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Significant and sustained antitumor activity in post-docetaxel, castration-resistant prostate cancer with the CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone acetate. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  E. Perez,et al.  Efficacy of ixabepilone in ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[33]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  M. Espié,et al.  Cyclophosphamide dose intensification may circumvent anthracycline resistance of p53 mutant breast cancers. , 2010, The oncologist.

[35]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Adenoid cystic carcinomas of the breast and salivary glands (or ‘The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde’ of exocrine gland carcinomas) , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[36]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Androgen receptor in breast cancer: expression in estrogen receptor-positive tumors and in estrogen receptor-negative tumors with apocrine differentiation , 2010, Modern Pathology.

[37]  Kornelia Polyak,et al.  Heterogeneity for Stem Cell–Related Markers According to Tumor Subtype and Histologic Stage in Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  J. Lubiński,et al.  Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Hugo M. Horlings,et al.  Integrative molecular profiling of triple negative breast cancers identifies amplicon drivers and potential therapeutic targets , 2009, Oncogene.

[40]  E. Winer,et al.  Neoadjuvant cisplatin and bevacizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Safety and efficacy. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  E. Perez,et al.  RIBBON-2: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab In Combination with Chemotherapy for Second-Line Treatment of HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. , 2009 .

[42]  H. Iwata,et al.  Phase III Randomized Trial of Sunitinib (SU) vs. Capecitabine (C) in Patients (Pts) with Previously Treated HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC). , 2009 .

[43]  W. Gradishar,et al.  A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib (SOR) in Combination with Paclitaxel (PAC) as a First-Line Therapy in Patients (pts) with Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (BC). , 2009 .

[44]  D. Miles,et al.  Comparison of Subgroup Analyses of PFS from Three Phase III Studies of Bevacizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC). , 2009 .

[45]  J. Baselga,et al.  SOLTI-0701: A Multinational Double-Blind, Randomized Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Compared to Placebo When Administered in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (BC). , 2009 .

[46]  Kum Kum Khanna,et al.  Recent Advances in Cancer Therapy Targeting Proteins Involved in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[47]  L. Skoog,et al.  Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[48]  J. Testa,et al.  mTOR Is a Promising Therapeutic Target Both in Cisplatin-Sensitive and Cisplatin-Resistant Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[49]  Yrjö Collan,et al.  Analysis of cyclins A, B1, D1 and E in breast cancer in relation to tumour grade and other prognostic factors , 2009, BMC Research Notes.

[50]  C. Perou,et al.  Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Secretory breast carcinomas with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene belong to the basal-like carcinoma spectrum , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[52]  E. Perez,et al.  Ixabepilone plus capecitabine vs capecitabine in patients with triple negative tumors: a pooled analysis of patients from two large phase III clinical studies. , 2009 .

[53]  M. Campone,et al.  Ixabepilone plus capecitabine vs capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving ixabepilone in the first line setting: a pooled analysis from two phase III studies. , 2009 .

[54]  Philippe Dessen,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Breast Cancer with High-Resolution Oligonucleotide Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[55]  I. Ellis,et al.  Triple‐negative/basal‐like breast cancer: review , 2009, Pathology.

[56]  T. Nielsen,et al.  Anthracyclines in basal breast cancer: The NCIC-CTG trial MA5 comparing adjuvant CMF to CEF. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[57]  A. Luini,et al.  Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with the “triple-negative” phenotype: prognostic implications of EGFR immunoreactivity , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[58]  S. Narod,et al.  Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[59]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Frequent PTEN genomic alterations and activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in basal-like breast cancer cells , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[60]  N. Lin,et al.  Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[61]  T. Nielsen,et al.  The combination of high cyclin E and Skp2 expression in breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and the basal phenotype. , 2008, Human pathology.

[62]  Stephen Green,et al.  AZD7762, a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[63]  S. Ashwell,et al.  DNA Damage Detection and Repair Pathways—Recent Advances with Inhibitors of Checkpoint Kinases in Cancer Therapy , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[64]  A. Tolcher,et al.  A phase IB study evaluating BSI-201 in combination with chemotherapy in subjects with advanced solid tumors , 2008 .

[65]  A. Tolcher,et al.  First in human phase I study of BSI-201, a small molecule inhibitor of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) in subjects with advanced solid tumors , 2008 .

[66]  S. Johnston,et al.  Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[67]  H. Rugo,et al.  Phase II study of sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[69]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[70]  F. Cognetti,et al.  HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  M. Sormani,et al.  HER2 status and efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[72]  J. Janetka,et al.  Keeping checkpoint kinases in line: new selective inhibitors in clinical trials. , 2008, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[73]  Robin L. Jones,et al.  Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline-treated patients , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[74]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[75]  S. Narod,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[76]  Xianglin Shi,et al.  AKT1 amplification regulates cisplatin resistance in human lung cancer cells through the mammalian target of rapamycin/p70S6K1 pathway. , 2007, Cancer research.

[77]  R. Cress,et al.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)‐negative, progesterone receptor (PR)‐negative, and HER2‐negative invasive breast cancer, the so‐called triple‐negative phenotype , 2007, Cancer.

[78]  C. Perou,et al.  The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[79]  L. Karnitz,et al.  Pharmacological Abrogation of S-Phase Checkpoint Enhances the Anti-Tumor Activity of Gemcitabine In Vivo , 2007, Cell cycle.

[80]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[81]  J. Dering,et al.  Dasatinib, an orally active small molecule inhibitor of both the src and abl kinases, selectively inhibits growth of basal-type/“triple-negative” breast cancer cell lines growing in vitro , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[82]  B. Lloveras,et al.  HER-2/neu status and response to CMF: retrospective study in a series of operable breast cancer treated with primary CMF chemotherapy , 2007, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[83]  T. Delozier,et al.  Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[84]  K. Gelmon,et al.  The role of capecitabine in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2006, The oncologist.

[85]  W. Gerald,et al.  An estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer subset characterized by a hormonally regulated transcriptional program and response to androgen , 2006, Oncogene.

[86]  R. Nicholson,et al.  Elevated Src activity promotes cellular invasion and motility in tamoxifen resistant breast cancer cells , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[87]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  KIT is highly expressed in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast, a basal-like carcinoma associated with a favorable outcome , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[88]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[89]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  Trabectedin in third line breast cancer: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study comparing two administration regimens , 2005 .

[90]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy , 2005, Nature.

[91]  H. Lane,et al.  The mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 Sensitizes Tumor Cells to DNA-Damaged Induced Apoptosis through Inhibition of p21 Translation , 2005, Cell.

[92]  H. Lane,et al.  The mTOR Inhibitor RAD 001 Sensitizes Tumor Cells to DNA-Damaged Induced Apoptosis through Inhibition of p 21 Translation , 2005 .

[93]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[94]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[95]  Alan Mackay,et al.  Expression profiling of purified normal human luminal and myoepithelial breast cells: identification of novel prognostic markers for breast cancer. , 2004, Cancer research.

[96]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[97]  I. Smith,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2000, Annals of medicine.

[98]  G. Rijksen,et al.  c‐Src PROTEIN EXPRESSION IS INCREASED IN HUMAN BREAST CANCER. AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS , 1996, The Journal of pathology.

[99]  B. Asselain,et al.  Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. , 1995, European journal of cancer.