Relevance of Molecular Groups in Children with Newly Diagnosed Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor: Results from Prospective St. Jude Multi-institutional Trials

Purpose: Report relevance of molecular groups to clinicopathologic features, germline SMARCB1/SMARCA4 alterations (GLA), and survival of children with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) treated in two multi-institutional clinical trials. Materials and Methods: Seventy-four participants with newly diagnosed ATRT were treated in two trials: infants (SJYC07: age < 3 years; n = 52) and children (SJMB03: age 3–21 years; n = 22), using surgery, conventional chemotherapy (infants), or dose-dense chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (children), and age- and risk-adapted radiotherapy [focal (infants) and craniospinal (CSI; children)]. Molecular groups ATRT-MYC (MYC), ATRT-SHH (SHH), and ATRT-TYR (TYR) were determined from tumor DNA methylation profiles. Results: Twenty-four participants (32%) were alive at time of analysis at a median follow-up of 8.4 years (range, 3.1–14.1 years). Methylation profiling classified 64 ATRTs as TYR (n = 21), SHH (n = 30), and MYC (n = 13), SHH group being associated with metastatic disease. Among infants, TYR group had the best overall survival (OS; P = 0.02). However, outcomes did not differ by molecular groups among infants with nonmetastatic (M0) disease. Children with M0 disease and <1.5 cm2 residual tumor had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 72.7 ± 12.7% and OS of 81.8 ± 11%. Infants with M0 disease had a 5-year PFS of 39.1 ± 11.5% and OS of 51.8 ± 12%. Those with metastases fared poorly [5-year OS 25 ± 12.5% (children) and 0% (infants)]. SMARCB1 GLAs were not associated with PFS. Conclusions: Among infants, those with ATRT-TYR had the best OS. ATRT-SHH was associated with metastases and consequently with inferior outcomes. Children with nonmetastatic ATRT benefit from postoperative CSI and adjuvant chemotherapy.

[1]  T. Zhou,et al.  Reply to S. Upadhyaya. , 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. Upadhyaya Relevance of the Type and Timing of Radiation Therapy to the Outcomes Reported in the ACNS0333 Trial for Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  T. Zhou,et al.  Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation for Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Trial ACNS0333. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M. Kool,et al.  Molecular subgrouping of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors—a reinvestigation and current consensus , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[5]  S. Bens,et al.  Age and DNA-methylation subgroup as potential independent risk factors for treatment stratification in children with Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors (ATRT). , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[6]  T. Merchant,et al.  Molecular Grouping and Outcomes of Young Children with Newly Diagnosed Ependymoma Treated on the Multi-Institutional SJYC07 Trial. , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[7]  Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011-2015. , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[8]  T. Merchant,et al.  Attainment of Functional and Social Independence in Adult Survivors of Pediatric CNS Tumors: A Report From the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Till Acker,et al.  DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours , 2018, Nature.

[10]  A. King,et al.  Assessment of the treatment approach and survival outcomes in a modern cohort of patients with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors using the National Cancer Database , 2017, Cancer.

[11]  R. Siebert,et al.  Improved 6‐year overall survival in AT/RT – results of the registry study Rhabdoid 2007 , 2016, Cancer medicine.

[12]  Roland Eils,et al.  Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Are Comprised of Three Epigenetic Subgroups with Distinct Enhancer Landscapes. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[13]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Molecular subgroups of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours in children: an integrated genomic and clinicopathological analysis. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  S. Sredni,et al.  Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome , 2015, Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society.

[15]  T. Athanasiou,et al.  Multimodal therapy in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor: individual pooled data analysis and review of the literature , 2015, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[16]  P. Modena,et al.  Favorable outcome of patients affected by rhabdoid tumors due to rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS) , 2014, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[17]  S. Bertolone,et al.  Intensive induction chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue for young children newly‐diagnosed with central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors: The head start III experience , 2014, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[18]  Laurens van der Maaten,et al.  Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  K. Roberts,et al.  Survival outcomes in atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor for patients undergoing radiotherapy in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis , 2012, Cancer.

[20]  Kristian Cibulskis,et al.  A remarkably simple genome underlies highly malignant pediatric rhabdoid cancers. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  N. André,et al.  Clinicopathologic prognostic factors in childhood atypical teratoid and rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system , 2012, Cancer.

[22]  D. Johnston,et al.  Central nervous system atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours: the Canadian Paediatric Brain Tumour Consortium experience. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[23]  B. Hinkes,et al.  Frequency, Risk‐Factors and Survival of Children With Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors (AT/RT) of the CNS Diagnosed between 1988 and 2004, and Registered to the German HIT Database , 2011, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[24]  J. Biegel,et al.  Clinicopathologic comparison of familial versus sporadic atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) of the central nervous system , 2011, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[25]  R. Siebert,et al.  Nonsense mutation and inactivation of SMARCA4 (BRG1) in an atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor showing retained SMARCB1 (INI1) expression. , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[26]  J. Biegel,et al.  Intensive multimodality treatment for children with newly diagnosed CNS atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  T. Merchant,et al.  Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[28]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor: results of therapy in children enrolled in a registry. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Laurence L. George,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[30]  J. Biegel,et al.  Germ-line and acquired mutations of INI1 in atypical teratoid and rhabdoid tumors. , 1999, Cancer research.

[31]  Olivier Delattre,et al.  Truncating mutations of hSNF5/INI1 in aggressive paediatric cancer , 1998, Nature.