Interaction of genotype-ecological type-plant spacing configuration in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in China

Grain sorghum has been a significant contributor to global food security since the prehistoric period and may contribute even more to the security of both food and energy in the future. Globally, precise management techniques are crucial for increasing grain sorghum productivity. In China, with diverse ecological types, variety introduction occasionally occurs across ecological zones. However, few information is available on the effect of ecological type on genotype performance and how plant spacing configuration influences grain yield in various ecological zones. Hence, a series of two-year field experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 in four ecological zones of China, from the northeast to the southwest. The experiments included six widely adapted sorghum varieties under six plant spacing configurations (two row spacing modes: equidistant row spacing (60 cm) mode and wide (80 cm)-narrow (40 cm) row spacing mode; three in-row plant spacings: 10 cm, 15 cm, and 20 cm). Our results indicated that ecological type, variety, and plant spacing configuration had a significant effect on sorghum yield. Ecological type contributed the highest proportion to the yield variance (49.8%), followed by variety (8.3%), while plant spacing configuration contributed 1.8%. Sorghum growth duration was highly influenced by the ecological type, accounting for 87.2% of its total variance, whereas plant height was mainly affected by genotype, which contributed 81.6% of the total variance. All test varieties, developed in the south or north, can reach maturity within 94-108 d, just before fall sowing in central China. Generally, sorghum growth duration becomes longer when a variety is introduced from south to north. A late-maturing variety, developed in the spring sowing and late-maturing regions, possibly could not reach maturity in the early-maturing region. The row spacing modes had no significant affect on sorghum yield, but the equal-row spacing mode consistently caused higher yields with only one exception; this might imply that equal-row spacing mode was more advantageous for boosting sorghum yield potential. In contrast, decreasing in-row plant spacing showed significant positive linear associations with sorghum grain yield in most cases. In addition, these results demonstrated that sorghum is a widely adapted crop and enables success in variety introduction across ecological zones.

[1]  Yan Huang,et al.  Interpretation of genotype-environment-sowing date/plant density interaction in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in early mature regions of China , 2022, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[2]  G. Nyamadzawo,et al.  Rainwater harvesting and Leucaena leucocephala biomass rates effects on soil moisture, water use efficiency and Sorghum bicolor [(L.) Moench] productivity in a semi-arid area in Zimbabwe. , 2022, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[3]  T. Steenhuis,et al.  Reduced groundwater use and increased grain production by optimized irrigation scheduling in winter wheat–summer maize double cropping system—A 16-year field study in North China Plain , 2022, Field Crops Research.

[4]  A. Audebert,et al.  Plant density and nitrogen fertilization optimization on sorghum grain yield in Mali , 2021, Agronomy Journal.

[5]  Jun Yu Li,et al.  Effects of nitrogen application strategy and planting density optimization on sorghum yield and quality , 2021 .

[6]  Guang-zhou LIU,et al.  Reducing maize yield gap by matching plant density and solar radiation , 2021 .

[7]  S. Adiku,et al.  Which is more important to sorghum production systems in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of West Africa: Climate change or improved management practices? , 2020, Agricultural Systems.

[8]  F. Below,et al.  Plant population and row spacing effects on corn: Plant growth, phenology, and grain yield , 2020 .

[9]  Xinzhi Cao,et al.  Effects of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculation on small fermentation starters in Sichuan-style Xiaoqu liquor. , 2020, Food research international.

[10]  F. Below,et al.  Plant population and row spacing effects on corn: Phenotypic traits of positive yield‐responsive hybrids , 2020, Agronomy Journal.

[11]  Qingbin Wang,et al.  China's alfalfa market and imports: Development, trends, and potential impacts of the U.S.–China trade dispute and retaliations , 2020 .

[12]  Yan Xu,et al.  Regional aroma characteristics of sorghum for Chinese liquor production , 2020 .

[13]  D. Jiang,et al.  Potential bioethanol production from sweet sorghum on marginal land in China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Yanjun Shen,et al.  Impacts of varied irrigation on field water budegts and crop yields in the North China Plain: Rainfed vs. irrigated double cropping system , 2017 .

[15]  M. Olsen,et al.  Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  Xianmin Diao Production and genetic improvement of minor cereals in China , 2017 .

[17]  Wei Chen,et al.  Assessment of Drought Impact on Main Cereal Crops Using a Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index in Liaoning Province, China , 2016 .

[18]  S. Rakshit,et al.  Economic Importance of Sorghum , 2016 .

[19]  Matias L. Ruffo,et al.  Evaluating Management Factor Contributions to Reduce Corn Yield Gaps , 2015 .

[20]  D. Timlin,et al.  Plant Density and Leaf Area Index Effects on the Distribution of Light Transmittance to the Soil Surface in Maize , 2014 .

[21]  K. N. Ganapathy,et al.  Changes in area, yield gains, and yield stability of sorghum in major sorghum-producing countries, 1970 to 2009 , 2014 .

[22]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[23]  Wei Wu,et al.  A general model for estimation of daily global solar radiation using air temperatures and site geographic parameters in Southwest China , 2013 .

[24]  C. Fernandez,et al.  Grain Sorghum Response to Row Spacing and Plant Populations in the Texas Coastal Bend Region , 2012 .

[25]  Kalaiyarasi Pidaran,et al.  Effect of planting geometry, hybrid maturity, and population density on yield and yield components in sorghum , 2012 .

[26]  Gaodi Xie,et al.  The productive potentials of sweet sorghum ethanol in China , 2010 .

[27]  R. Klein,et al.  Skip‐Row and Plant Population Effects on Sorghum Grain Yield , 2010 .

[28]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  Seasonal distributions of mercury species and their relationship to some physicochemical factors in Puding Reservoir, Guizhou, China. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  F. Andrade,et al.  Why Do Maize Hybrids Respond Differently to Variations in Plant Density , 2007 .

[30]  U. D. Perdok,et al.  Developments in conservation tillage in rainfed regions of North China , 2007 .

[31]  T. Howell,et al.  Seeding Practices, Cultivar Maturity, and Irrigation Effects on Simulated Grain Sorghum Yield , 2006 .

[32]  A. Matusevičiūtė,et al.  Effects of Different Cadmium Concentrations on Survival Reproduction and Adaptation of Eisenia Fetida Californica , 2005 .

[33]  S. Conley,et al.  Grain Sorghum Response to Row Spacing, Plant Density, and Planter Skips , 2005 .

[34]  Yu Li,et al.  Genetic contribution of Chinese landraces to the development of sorghum hybrids , 1998, Euphytica.

[35]  J. Faci,et al.  Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench) yield compensation processes under different plant densities and variable water supply , 2001 .

[36]  D. Devlin,et al.  Grain Sorghum Response to Row Spacings and Seeding Rates in Kansas , 1999 .

[37]  J. F. Stone,et al.  Stomatal Response to High Evaporative Demand in Irrigated Grain Sorghum in Narrow and Wide Row Spacing , 1995 .

[38]  Jean L. Steiner,et al.  Dryland Grain Sorghum Water Use, Light Interception, and Growth Responses to Planting Geometry1 , 1986 .

[39]  R. L. Vanderlip,et al.  Growth Stages of Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor, (L.) Moench.]1 , 1972 .

[40]  A. Blum Effect of plant density and growth duration on grain sorghum yield under limited water supply. , 1970 .