Determination of the adequate minimum model complexity required in anaerobic bioprocesses using experimental data

BACKGROUND: Modelling of anaerobic bioprocesses requires adequate conciliation between model accuracy and complexity. Anaerobic digestion is a highly complex biocatalysed process in which organic (waste) materials are converted into biogas. Complex mathematical models of the process can be difficult to manage, while too simplistic models may be insufficient for specific applications. RESULTS: A technique based on principal component analysis (PCA) is presented to assess the most adequate complexity in anaerobic bioprocess models using preliminary data. The technique is applied to experimental data from a continuously operated pilot-scale anaerobic digestion process treating diluted wine and to process simulation data generated by a highly complex model (ADM1). The results obtained suggest that models incorporating only four reactions can describe most of the experimental data variability. Similarly, a simplification of the highly complex modified ADM1 used to a four-reaction model could attain equivalent simulation accuracy. A set of possible four-reaction networks was evaluated using the PCA information and a best candidate network of reactions is obtained. CONCLUSION: The developed PCA-based tool allows for the assessment of the adequate complexity in mathematical models of anaerobic digestion of ethanol, a process that appears describable with a high level of accuracy by considering only four biological reactions. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry

[1]  J J Distefano,et al.  DIMSUM: an expert system for multiexponential model discrimination. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[2]  J Keller,et al.  A review of ADM1 extensions, applications, and analysis: 2002-2005. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  O Bernard,et al.  Can we assess the model complexity for a bioprocess: theory and example of the anaerobic digestion process. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  J M Lema,et al.  Variable stoichiometry with thermodynamic control in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  R. Moletta,et al.  A molecular method to study population and activity dynamics in anaerobic digestors. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  V. Vavilin,et al.  Simulation model ‘methane’ as a tool for effective biogas production during anaerobic conversion of complex organic matter , 1994 .

[8]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  J M Lema,et al.  Selection of variables using factorial discriminant analysis for the state identification of an anaerobic UASB-UAF hybrid pilot plant, fed with winery effluents. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  A Genovesi,et al.  Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  W. Gujer,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Anaerobic Mesophilic Sewage Sludge Treatment , 1993 .

[12]  Georges Bastin,et al.  On the estimation of the pseudo-stoichiometric matrix for macroscopic mass balance modelling of biotechnological processes. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[13]  B. Ahring,et al.  A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates: Focusing on ammonia inhibition , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Peter L. Lee,et al.  Dynamic modelling of a single-stage high-rate anaerobic reactor—I. Model derivation , 1991 .

[15]  F. Mosey Mathematical Modelling of the Anaerobic Digestion Process: Regulatory Mechanisms for the Formation of Short-Chain Volatile Acids from Glucose , 1983 .

[16]  Georges Bastin,et al.  Identification of reaction networks for bioprocesses: determination of a partially unknown pseudo-stoichiometric matrix , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering (Print).

[17]  E Roca,et al.  Advanced monitoring and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants: diagnosis and supervision by a fuzzy-based expert system. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  J. A. Spriet,et al.  A simulation study of structure characterization methods , 1983 .