Looking for the perfect tweet. The use of data mining techniques to find influencers on twitter

Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate influencers on Twitter to discover the characteristics of their tweets through PIAR, a unique data mining research tool developed by the University of Salamanca that combines graph theory and social influence theory. An analysis of 3853 users posting about two automotive Japanese car firms, Toyota and Nissan, reveals the characteristics influencers have on this social network. The findings suggest that influencers use more hashtags and mentions on average when they tweet, and their word count is fewer than those with less power on this virtual community. Surprisingly, they tend to include less embedded links on their posts. Additionally, influencers have on average a large number of people they follow and they clearly express their opinions and feelings (either positive or negative) when tweeting. The results broaden the understanding of how influencers write and behave on social networks when they communicate with their users' community. Further, it provides insights for practitioners and marketers on how to discover influencers talking about their brands by observing tweets' content.

[1]  Doug Schuler,et al.  New community networks - wired for change , 1996 .

[2]  Glenn H. Reynolds,et al.  An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths , 2006 .

[3]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Twitter in mass emergency: what NLP techniques can contribute , 2010, HLT-NAACL 2010.

[5]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[6]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors , 2016 .

[7]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[8]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  Albert Bifet,et al.  Sentiment Knowledge Discovery in Twitter Streaming Data , 2010, Discovery Science.

[10]  Teruo Higashino,et al.  Twitter user profiling based on text and community mining for market analysis , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies , 2003 .

[12]  Geert-Jan Houben,et al.  What Makes a Tweet Relevant for a Topic? , 2012, #MSM.

[13]  Renée M. E. Pratt,et al.  Click-and-Mortar SMEs: Attracting customers to your website , 2014 .

[14]  Eileen A. Hogan The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business , 2001 .

[15]  Dion Hoe-Lian Goh,et al.  "Gone too soon": did Twitter grieve for Michael Jackson? , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[16]  Rebeca San José-Cabezudo,et al.  Determinants of Opening-Forwarding E-Mail Messages , 2012 .

[17]  Anita L. Blanchard Testing a model of sense of virtual community , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Francisco Moreno Fernández,et al.  El español en el mundo , 1998 .

[19]  KhazanchiDeepak,et al.  An Empirical Study of Online Word of Mouth as a Predictor for Multi-product Category e-Commerce Sales , 2008 .

[20]  L. A. Brouwer,et al.  Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online , 2010 .

[21]  Bin Gu,et al.  Do online reviews matter? - An empirical investigation of panel data , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Detecting Evangelists and Detractors on Twitter , 2010 .

[23]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[24]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[25]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[26]  Rebeca Cordero-Gutiérrez,et al.  Intention to participate in online commercial experiments by social network’s users: Differences in gender and age , 2016 .

[27]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[28]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Detecting Spammers on Twitter , 2010 .

[29]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[30]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness , 2010, CHI.

[31]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Microblogs in Higher Education - A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Hanan Samet,et al.  TwitterStand: news in tweets , 2009, GIS.

[33]  Hongchul Lee,et al.  Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: Measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Nicholas G. Carr The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business [Book Reviews] , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[35]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[36]  Ya-Peng Zhang,et al.  Content or context: Which matters more in information processing on microblogging sites , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Ana María Díaz Martín,et al.  Explotando datos de Twitter: como captar las relaciones entre clientes , 2014 .

[38]  Matthew A. Russell,et al.  Mining the Social Web: Data Mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, GitHub, and More , 2018 .

[39]  Rolena Adorno,et al.  El español en el mundo , 2015 .

[40]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[41]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  You followed my bot! Transforming robots into influential users in Twitter , 2013, First Monday.

[42]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[43]  Chris Evans,et al.  The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Scott Counts,et al.  Identifying topical authorities in microblogs , 2011, WSDM '11.

[45]  Dongyoung Sohn,et al.  Coping with information in social media: The effects of network structure and knowledge on perception of information value , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  C. Flavián,et al.  The influence of virtual communities on distribution strategies in the internet , 2005 .

[47]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Jacques Bulchand-Gidumal,et al.  Intentions to use social media in organizing and taking vacation trips , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Tom Chippendale About the company , 2015 .

[50]  Lu Liu,et al.  Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging , 2012, Internet Res..

[51]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Understanding and combating link farming in the twitter social network , 2012, WWW.

[52]  Chei Sian Lee,et al.  Tweeting the friendly skies: Investigating information exchange among Twitter users about airlines , 2012, Program.

[53]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams , 2010, CSCW '10.

[54]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[55]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Understand the Perils of Co-Creation , 2013 .

[56]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Changing of the guard , 2009 .

[57]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[58]  Glen Urban,et al.  Don't Just Relate - Advocate!: A Blueprint for Profit in the Era of Customer Power , 2005 .

[59]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[60]  Deepak Khazanchi,et al.  An Empirical Study of Online Word of Mouth as a Predictor for Multi-product Category e-Commerce Sales , 2008, Electron. Mark..

[61]  EvansChris,et al.  The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions , 2016 .

[62]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information , 2010, CSCW '10.

[63]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites , 2011 .

[64]  Joe Phua,et al.  Following Celebrities’ Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers’ Source Credibility Perception, Buying Intention, and Social Identification With Celebrities , 2014 .

[65]  Stephen Dann,et al.  Twitter content classification , 2010, First Monday.