Abstract A hydromechanical deep drawing process (which replaces the conventional rigid blank-holder tool with a hydrostatic fluid pressure) is utilized to study the roles played by die curvature, interfacial friction, material hardening, etc. in deep drawing performance. The analytical study is based on limit analysis in plasticity (applying both the upper and the lower bounds simultaneously) with a special emphasis on the geometry of the die profile. The resulting relationships between the various parameters obtained through the bounds are backed by an independent numerical solution using Woo's finite difference scheme. The associated experiments, with which the limit analysis is compared, were conducted with aluminium blanks at various die radii and with various holding fluid pressures. The relatively close proximity of the above solutions, in describing the observed behaviour of the process, enables one to draw a few general conclusions about the strength of the limit analysis in describing realistic deep drawing processes. Also potential improvements concerning the choice of die radius of curvature and the blank holding force are indicated.
[1]
S Yossifon,et al.
Deep Drawing with a Fluid Pressure Assisted Blankholder
,
1992
.
[2]
Bernard Budiansky,et al.
On the Swift cup test
,
1966
.
[3]
Jehuda Tirosh,et al.
High speed deep drawing of hardening and rate sensitive solids with small interfacial friction
,
1987
.
[4]
Shiro Kobayashi,et al.
The Effect of Anisotropy and Work-Hardening Characteristics on the Stress and Strain Distribution in Deep Drawing
,
1966
.
[5]
S. Yossifon,et al.
Buckling prevention by lateral fluid pressure in deep-drawing
,
1985
.
[6]
S. Yossifon,et al.
Rupture instability in hydroforming deep-drawing process☆
,
1985
.
[7]
S. Yossifon,et al.
On suppression of plastic buckling in hydroforming processes
,
1984
.
[8]
D. M. Woo.
Analysis of the Cup-Drawing Process
,
1964
.