On the Study of Social Interactions in Twitter

Twitter and other social media platforms are increasingly used as the primary way in which people speak with each other. As opposed to other platforms, Twitter is interesting in that many of these dialogues are public and so we can get a view into the dynamics of dialogues and how they differ from other other tweet behaviors. We here analyze tweets gathered from 2400 twitter streams over a one month period. We study social interactions in three important dimensions: what are the salient user behaviors in terms of how often they have social interactions and how these interactions are spread among different people; what are the characteristics of the dialogues, or sets of tweets, that we can extract from these interactions, and what are the characteristics of the social network which emerges from considering these interactions? We find that roughly half of the users spend a fair amount of time interacting whereas 40% of users do not seem to have active interactions. We also find that the vast majority of active dialogues only involve two people despite the public nature of these tweets. We finally find that while the emerging social network does contain a giant component, the component clearly is a set of well-defined tight clusters which are loosely connected.

[1]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Modeling Blog Dynamics , 2009, ICWSM.

[2]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[3]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Looking at the Blogosphere Topology through Different Lenses , 2007, ICWSM.

[4]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Community Structure in Large Networks: Natural Cluster Sizes and the Absence of Large Well-Defined Clusters , 2008, Internet Math..

[5]  Tomek Strzalkowski,et al.  Modeling Sociocultural phenomena in discourse , 2012, Natural Language Engineering.

[6]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Using a model of social dynamics to predict popularity of news , 2010, WWW '10.

[7]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources , 2009, WSM@MM.

[9]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  On the Bursty Evolution of Blogspace , 2003, WWW '03.

[10]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs , 2007 .

[11]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Communities in Networks , 2009, ArXiv.

[12]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A framework for quantitative analysis of cascades on networks , 2010, WSDM '11.

[13]  Nick Koudas,et al.  Information Cascades in the Blogosphere: A Look Behind the Curtain , 2009, ICWSM.

[14]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Blogging Together: An Examination of Group Blogs , 2009, ICWSM.

[15]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  A Qualitative Examination of Topical Tweet and Retweet Practices , 2010, ICWSM.

[16]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[17]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[18]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups , 2007, J. Soc. Struct..

[19]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[20]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Structural analysis of chat messages for topic detection , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Lisa Singh,et al.  Understanding actor loyalty to event-based groups in affiliation networks , 2011, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[22]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters , 2006, TKDD.

[23]  Tim Finin,et al.  Web 2.0 Mining: Analyzing Social Media , 2007 .

[24]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[25]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Center of Attention: How Facebook Users Allocate Attention across Friends , 2011, ICWSM.

[26]  Hanan Samet,et al.  TwitterStand: news in tweets , 2009, GIS.

[27]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Huan Liu,et al.  Blogosphere: research issues, tools, and applications , 2008, SKDD.

[29]  Ruimin Shen,et al.  Microblogging for Language Learning: Using Twitter to Train Communicative and Cultural Competence , 2009, ICWL.

[30]  Matthew Michelson,et al.  Tweet Disambiguate Entities Retrieve Folksonomy SubTree Step 1 : Discover Categories Generate Topic Profile from SubTrees Step 2 : Discover Profile Topic Profile : “ English Football ” “ World Cup ” , 2011 .

[31]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  A few chirps about twitter , 2008, WOSN '08.

[32]  Tomek Strzalkowski,et al.  Modeling Socio-Cultural Phenomena in Discourse , 2010, COLING.