Enhancing Distance Learning for Today's Youth with Learner-Centered Principles.

Providi ng a research-validated, evidence-based framework for designing effective distance learning experiences and environments is a current challenge to those interested in using this technology effectively with adolescents. This article offers the Learner­Centered Psychological Principles (LCPs) developed and disseminated by the American Psychological Association as a framework for developing design principles for distance learning for use in high schools. The argument is made and supported by research that today's youth are increasingly disengaged from traditional forms of instruction, and unless distance learning can offer an alternative paradigm that meets their learning needs, the potential of distance learning will not be realized. More importantly, this technology alone will not address the needs of today's youth to be prepared with 21 st century skills for a global world. The authors describe how the LCPs can be used to define not only new design principles for distance learning but also a new educational paradigm.

[1]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? , 2004 .

[2]  Amber Dailey-Hebert,et al.  Engaging Learner Attribute Research in Dialogue with Classroom Practice: Predictors of Success in the Accelerated, Online Classroom , 2006 .

[3]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[4]  Jeffrey H. D. Cornelius-White.  Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[5]  R. N. Caine,et al.  The Way We Learn. , 2006 .

[6]  John F. Watson,et al.  Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning: A Review of State-Level Policy and Practice, 2008. , 2008 .

[7]  C. Candace Chou,et al.  Formative evaluation of synchronous CMC systems for a learner-centered online course , 2001 .

[8]  Brian Miller,et al.  Factors Related to Success and Satisfaction in Online Learning , 2002 .

[9]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[10]  Kathryn R Wentzel,et al.  Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. , 2002, Child development.

[11]  Rhona S. Weinstein,et al.  The social context of early schooling and children's school adjustment , 1998 .

[12]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Positive psychology. An introduction. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[13]  B. McCombs,et al.  The Learner-Centered Classroom and School: Strategies for Increasing Student Motivation and Achievement. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. , 1997 .

[14]  Heather P Libbey,et al.  Measuring student relationships to school: attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. , 2004, The Journal of school health.

[15]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The ‘New’ Science of Networks and the Challenge of School Change , 2007 .

[16]  D. R. Garrison,et al.  Mapping the boundaries of distance education: Problems in defining the field , 1987 .

[17]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[18]  B. McCombs,et al.  A Learner-Centered Framework for E-Learning. , 2005 .

[19]  W. Hannum,et al.  Analysis of distance education use in rural schools , 2006 .

[20]  Z. Berge,et al.  Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study , 2005 .

[21]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. , 2007 .

[22]  Robert C. Pianta,et al.  Enhancing Relationships Between Children and Teachers , 1999 .

[23]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  Learner-Centered Classroom Practices and Assessments: Maximizing Student Motivation, Learning, and Achievement , 2006 .

[24]  Charles B. Fleming,et al.  The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: findings from the Social Development Research Group. , 2004, The Journal of school health.

[25]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Learner Issues With WWW-Based Systems , 1999 .

[26]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  What''s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning , 1999 .

[27]  Catherine McLoughlin.  How does the quality debate relate to the nature of the student experience online , 2003 .

[28]  Judy Breck.  When educational resources are open , 2007 .

[29]  When computers teach: A review of the instructional effectiveness of computers , 2007 .

[30]  M. D. Roblyer.  Virtually Successful: Defeating the Dropout Problem through Online School Programs , 2006 .

[31]  Robert Blomeyer,et al.  The Effects of Distance Education on K-12 Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. , 2004 .

[32]  M. Allen,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Comparison Using Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[33]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[34]  M. Prensky.  Listen to the Natives. , 2006 .

[35]  C. Swanson.  Who Graduates? Who Doesn't?: A Statistical Portrait of Public High School Graduation, Class of 2001 , 2004 .

[36]  Stringfellow Barr,et al.  Citizens of the World , 1953 .

[37]  Luc G. Pelletier,et al.  Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support , 2006 .

[38]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education : cases from higher education , 2003 .

[39]  M. Suárez-Orozco,et al.  Wanted: Global Citizens. , 2007 .

[40]  D. Keegan.  Problems in Defining the Field of Distance Education , 1988 .

[41]  Donald E. Hanna,et al.  Benchmarking Quality in Online Degree Programs Status and Prospects. , 2006 .