Efficacy and efficiency of a lean cataract pathway: a comparative study

Background The demand for cataract surgery is rising, calling for pathways that have good access and are cost-effective. Lean thinking is a management strategy, aimed at improving quality while reducing costs. Lean production processes are designed to identify gaps between expected and actual performance. Aim To analyse the efficacy and efficiency of a lean cataract pathway. Methods Lean care delivered to a prospective cohort (616 cataract patients) was compared (1) with traditional care delivered to a historical cohort (591 cataract patients) and (2) with expected lean care in the prospective cohort. To evaluate efficacy, the authors analysed how many patients received care that adhered to the lean pathway's specifications. To evaluate efficiency, the authors analysed how often patients visited the hospital and how many additional patients could access the pathway. Results In the lean pathway, patient visits decreased by 23%, and access to the cataract pathway increased with 42%. A 40% decrease in patient visits and a 76% increase in access could have been realised if healthcare staff would have adhered to the lean pathway's specifications. Practice implications Lean pathways can realise large improvements, and still have a significant gap between expected and actual care delivery. The challenge for healthcare teams is not to improve care delivery by using lean pathways as opposed to using traditional pathways, but to strive for optimal performance by consistently adhering to the specifications of the lean pathway.

[1]  A. Gurses,et al.  Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[2]  Steven J Spear,et al.  Fixing Healthcare from the Inside: Teaching Residents to Heal Broken Delivery Processes As They Heal Sick Patients , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  D. King,et al.  Redesigning emergency department patient flows: Application of Lean Thinking to health care , 2006, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[4]  G. Gole,et al.  The efficacy of a nurse‐led preoperative cataract assessment and postoperative care clinic , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  Marjorie M Godfrey,et al.  Creating a lean practice. , 2006, Family practice management.

[6]  Steven J Spear,et al.  Fixing health care from the inside, today. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[7]  K Walshe,et al.  Rules and guidelines in clinical practice: a qualitative study in operating theatres of doctors’ and nurses’ views , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Reducing waste and errors: piloting lean principles at Intermountain Healthcare. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[9]  A. Hildreth,et al.  Comparative study of first‐day postoperative cataract review methods , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  J. Klein,et al.  Using industrial processes to improve patient care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Gail A. Wolf,et al.  Driving Improvement in Patient Care: Lessons From Toyota , 2003, The Journal of nursing administration.

[12]  P. Ewings,et al.  Is visual outcome compromised when next day review is omitted after phacoemulsification surgery? A randomised control trial , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Berwick,et al.  Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. , 2003, JAMA.

[14]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  A. Reidy,et al.  National cataract surgery survey 1997–8: a report of the results of the clinical outcomes , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[17]  D. Flanagan,et al.  Complications of phacoemulsification on the first postoperative day: can follow-up be safely changed? , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  G. Michelson,et al.  Changing leaders: the board's role in CEO succession ... roundtable discussion. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[19]  William E. Youngdahl,et al.  “Lean” service: in defense of a production‐line approach , 1998 .

[20]  A Hofman,et al.  Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  A. Cassels-Brown,et al.  Shared care postoperative management of cataract patients , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  Revicki Da,et al.  Quality of care in cataract surgery cases experiencing post-operative complications with co-managed care. , 1995 .

[23]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  From lean production to the lean enterprise , 1994 .

[24]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[25]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[26]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[27]  T. Levitt Production-Line Approach to Service , 2012 .

[28]  T. Tilburg,et al.  Eenzaamheid. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid , 2010 .

[29]  P. Gogate Small incision cataract surgery: Complications and mini-review , 2009, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  L. Kuntz,et al.  Process-based organization design and hospital efficiency. , 2007, Health care management review.

[31]  J. Bahensky,et al.  Lean sigma--will it work for healthcare? , 2005, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[32]  D. Revicki,et al.  Quality of care in cataract surgery cases experiencing post-operative complications with co-managed care. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.