Rotorcraft simulations: a challenge for CFD

This paper gives an overview of CFD techniques developed and used at ONERA for rotorcraft applications. First, the complex multidisciplinary environment around helicopters, in which aerodynamics, flight dynamics, aeroelasticity and aeroacoustics strongly interact, is highlighted. Rotorcraft simulations are thus performed by comprehensive codes capable of dealing with the whole system efficiently, using integrated simplified models for each discipline, e.g. the aerodynamics. However, fast aerodynamic models cannot accurately represent the full complexity of rotorcraft aerodynamics, in particular as far as nonlinear phenomena are concerned, contrary to CFD. Nevertheless, helicopter problems are particularly demanding for numerical methods, requiring efficient simulation of unsteady flows with shock waves, massive flow separation, concentrated vortex structures and deforming bodies with large amplitude relative motion, while allowing fine description and analysis of local flow phenomena impacting the vehicle behaviour. Helicopter trim in the CFD solution is obtained by iterative coupling with comprehensive analysis, so that the global multidisciplinary simulation can be achieved with an advanced aerodynamic model. The approaches taken by ONERA for the comprehensive code and the CFD solvers are outlined in the paper. Examples of applications typical of rotorcraft problems are given to illustrate current possibilities and difficulties. They include an isolated rotor in hover, the dynamic stall of an oscillating wing, an isolated rotor in descent flight with Blade-Vortex Interactions, the dynamic-aerodynamic coupling of a rotor in high-speed forward flight and the simulation of a complete helicopter in forward flight. Finally, expected and needed developments are reviewed in order to make CFD a more efficient tool in the design office of helicopter manufacturers.

[1]  Roger C. Strawn,et al.  30 Years of Rotorcraft Computational Fluid Dynamics Research and Development , 2006 .

[2]  Thorsten Schwarz,et al.  The GOAHEAD project – overview and selected results , 2010 .

[3]  M. Costes,et al.  A weak coupling method between the dynamics code HOST and the 3D unsteady Euler code WAVES , 2001 .

[4]  Anton J. Landgrebe,et al.  The Wake Geometry of a Hovering Helicopter Rotor and its Influence on Rotor Performance , 1972 .

[5]  Andrew M. Wissink,et al.  Helios Adaptive Mesh Refinement for HART II Rotor Wake Simulations , 2012 .

[6]  Mark Potsdam,et al.  CFD adaptive mesh refinement for rotorcraft wake simulations , 2011 .

[7]  Hitoshi Murayama,et al.  Weak Coupling , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[8]  R. A. Ormiston,et al.  Comparison and validation of the France/USA finite state rotor dynamic inflow models , 2010 .

[9]  Mark Potsdam,et al.  A Coupled Unstructured-Adaptive Cartesian CFD Approach for Hover Prediction , 2010 .

[10]  M. Gazaix,et al.  THE elsA OBJECT-ORIENTED COMPUTATIONAL TOOL FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[11]  O. J. Boelens,et al.  Boundary Conforming Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Approach for Rotorcraft Simulations , 2002 .

[12]  Antony Jameson,et al.  An Assessment of Dual-Time Stepping, Time Spectral and Artificial Compressibility based Numerical Algorithms for Unsteady , 2009 .

[13]  Andrew M. Wissink,et al.  Rotor Loads Prediction In Level and Maneuvering Flight Using Unstructured-Adaptive Cartesian CFD , 2011 .

[14]  Johan C. Kok,et al.  Resolving the Dependence on Freestream Values for the k- Turbulence Model , 2000 .

[15]  Christophe Benoit,et al.  Automatic off-body overset adaptive Cartesian mesh method based on an octree approach , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  J. Raddatz,et al.  Calculations of Multibladed Rotors in Hover using 3D Euler Methods of DLR and ONERA , 1995 .

[17]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Coupled CFD/CSD prediction of rotor aerodynamic and structural dynamic loads for three critical flight conditions , 2005 .

[18]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Mark Potsdam,et al.  Rotor Airloads Prediction Using Loose Aerodynamic/Structural Coupling , 2004 .

[20]  Altmikus,et al.  A Comparison: Weak Versus Strong Modular Coupling for Trimmed Aeroelastic Rotor Simulations , 2002 .

[21]  Atcom,et al.  A Structured/Unstructured Embedded Grid Solver for Helicopter Rotor Flows , 1994 .

[22]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[23]  Berend G. van der Wall,et al.  Progress in Weak Fluid-Structure-Coupling for Multibladed Rotors in High-Speed forward Flight , 2002 .

[24]  Elizabeth M. Lee-Rausch,et al.  Computation of UH-60A Airloads Using CFD/CSD Coupling on Unstructured Meshes , 2011 .

[25]  J. Raddatz 3D Euler Calculations of Multibladed Rotors in Hover: Investigation of the Wake Capturing Properties , 1994 .

[26]  Klausdieter Pahlke The GOAHEAD Project , 2007 .

[27]  Hanno H. Heller,et al.  HHC Aeroacoustics Rotor Test at the DNW. - The Joint German/French/US HART Project - , 1994 .

[28]  J. Benek,et al.  A flexible grid embedding technique with application to the Euler equations , 1983 .

[29]  Roger C. Strawn,et al.  CFD Simulations of Tiltrotor Configurations in Hover , 2005 .

[30]  Roger C. Strawn,et al.  Computational Modeling of Hovering Rotor and Wake Aerodynamics , 2001 .

[31]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[32]  Narayanan Komerath,et al.  A Review of Rotor Wake Physics and Modeling , 2011 .

[33]  M. S. Howe Acoustics of fluid-structure interactions , 1998 .

[34]  Berend G. van der Wall,et al.  The HART-II Test: Rotor Wakes and Aeroacoustics with Higher-Harmonic Pitch Control (HHC) Inputs - The Joint German/French/Dutch/US Project , 2002 .

[35]  Robert L. Meakin,et al.  Object X-Rays for Cutting Holes in Composite Overset Structured Grids , 2001 .

[36]  W. von Grünhagen,et al.  HOST, a General Helicopter Simulation Tool for Germany and France , 2000 .

[37]  J. Edwards,et al.  Low-Diffusion Flux-Splitting Methods for Flows at All Speeds , 1997 .

[38]  M. S. Howe Acoustics of Fluid–Structure Interactions: Index , 1998 .

[39]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[40]  Markus Raffel,et al.  On the Generation of a Helicopter Aerodynamic Database , 2011 .

[41]  W. Mccroskey,et al.  Navier-Stokes calculations of hovering rotor flowfields , 1988 .

[42]  J. Baeder,et al.  Flowfield of a Lifting Rotor in Hover: A Navier-Stokes Simulation , 1992 .

[43]  Christophe Benoit,et al.  Unsteady Computations of the Flowfield around a Helicopter Rotor with Model Support , 2005 .

[44]  Christophe Benoit,et al.  Third‐order Cartesian overset mesh adaptation method for solving steady compressible flows , 2008 .

[45]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[46]  M. Costes,et al.  Numerical simulations of unsteady aerodynamics of helicopter rotor in manoeuvring flight conditions , 2004 .

[47]  Kai Richter,et al.  Improved Two-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Prediction with Structured and Hybrid Numerical Methods , 2011 .

[48]  Christian Kleinewächter,et al.  On identification , 2005, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[49]  Jasim Ahmad,et al.  Helicopter rotor blade computation in unsteady flows using moving overset grids , 1996 .

[50]  Thomas Renaud,et al.  Computation of GOAHEAD configuration with Chimera assembly , 2012 .

[51]  Michel Costes,et al.  Overview of Results Obtained During the 6-Year French-German CHANCE Project , 2005 .

[52]  John Steinhoff,et al.  Treatment of Vortical Flow Using Vorticity Confinement , 2005 .

[53]  Roger C. Strawn,et al.  Hovering Rotor and Wake Calculations with an Overset-Grid Navier-Stokes Solver , 1999 .