Site Occupancy Models with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities

Models for estimating the probability of occurrence of a species in the presence of imperfect detection are important in many ecological disciplines. In these "site occupancy" models, the possibility of heterogeneity in detection probabilities among sites must be considered because variation in abundance (and other factors) among sampled sites induces variation in detection probability (p). In this article, I develop occurrence probability models that allow for heterogeneous detection probabilities by considering several common classes of mixture distributions for p. For any mixing distribution, the likelihood has the general form of a zero-inflated binomial mixture for which inference based upon integrated likelihood is straightforward. A recent paper by Link demonstrates that in closed population models used for estimating population size, different classes of mixture distributions are indistinguishable from data, yet can produce very different inferences about population size. I demonstrate that this problem can also arise in models for estimating site occupancy in the presence of heterogeneous detection probabilities. The implications of this are discussed in the context of an application to avian survey data and the development of animal monitoring programs.

[1]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[2]  Marc Kery,et al.  Inferring the absence of a species -- a case study of snakes , 2002 .

[3]  K. Burnham,et al.  Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals , 1978 .

[4]  D. A. Williams,et al.  Extra‐Binomial Variation in Logistic Linear Models , 1982 .

[5]  A. Agresti,et al.  The Use of Mixed Logit Models to Reflect Heterogeneity in Capture‐Recapture Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[6]  S. Pledger Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[7]  W. Link Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture‐Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities , 2003, Biometrics.

[8]  S. Fienberg,et al.  Classical multilevel and Bayesian approaches to population size estimation using multiple lists , 1999 .

[9]  John Hinde,et al.  Models for count data with many zeros , 1998 .

[10]  Catherine A. Langtimm,et al.  The U.S. National Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative and the role of protected areas , 2001 .

[11]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating Size and Composition of Biological Communities by Modeling the Occurrence of Species , 2005 .

[12]  P. Nurmi Mixture Models , 2008 .

[13]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[14]  J. Norris,et al.  NONPARAMETRIC MLE UNDER TWO CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS WITH HETEROGENEITY , 1996 .

[15]  James T. Peterson,et al.  An approach to estimate probability of presence and richness of fish species , 2001 .

[16]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals , 2003, Biometrics.