Enzyme Localization Can Drastically Affect Signal Amplification in Signal Transduction Pathways
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Berg,et al. Single-cell FRET imaging of phosphatase activity in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis system. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[2] H. Berg,et al. Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions , 2000, Molecular microbiology.
[3] M. Elowitz,et al. Protein Mobility in the Cytoplasm ofEscherichia coli , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.
[4] Adam P Arkin,et al. Phosphatase localization in bacterial chemotaxis: divergent mechanisms, convergent principles , 2005, Physical biology.
[5] Eric Karsenti,et al. Spatial Coordination of Spindle Assembly by Chromosome-Mediated Signaling Gradients , 2005, Science.
[6] M. Ehrenberg,et al. Fluctuations and quality of control in biological cells: zero-order ultrasensitivity reinvestigated. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[7] P. R. ten Wolde,et al. Signal detection, modularity, and the correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic noise in biochemical networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.
[8] A. Arkin,et al. Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[9] D. Bray,et al. Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.
[10] B. Kholodenko. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[11] J. Paulsson. Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.
[12] D. Koshland,et al. Ultrasensitivity in biochemical systems controlled by covalent modification. Interplay between zero-order and multistep effects. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[13] G. Fang,et al. HURP controls spindle dynamics to promote proper interkinetochore tension and efficient kinetochore capture , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.
[14] D. Koshland,et al. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] Eric Karsenti,et al. Stathmin-Tubulin Interaction Gradients in Motile and Mitotic Cells , 2004, Science.
[16] B N Kholodenko,et al. Spatial gradients of cellular phospho‐proteins , 1999, FEBS letters.
[17] L. Shapiro,et al. MipZ, a Spatial Regulator Coordinating Chromosome Segregation with Cell Division in Caulobacter , 2006, Cell.
[18] B N Kholodenko,et al. Diffusion control of protein phosphorylation in signal transduction pathways. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.
[19] J. Timmer,et al. Design principles of a bacterial signalling network , 2005, Nature.
[20] D. Bray,et al. Simulated Diffusion of Phosphorylated CheY through the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.
[21] J. Ferrell. Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[22] Karsten Weis,et al. Visualization of a Ran-GTP Gradient in Interphase and Mitotic Xenopus Egg Extracts , 2002, Science.
[23] Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al. Engineering aspects of enzymatic signal transduction: photoreceptors in the retina. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[24] K. Fujimoto,et al. Noisy signal amplification in ultrasensitive signal transduction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] H. Berg,et al. Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] H Wang,et al. Characterization of the CheAS/CheZ complex: a specific interaction resulting in enhanced dephosphorylating activity on CheY‐phosphate , 1996, Molecular microbiology.