论文信息 - Probing inputs for subspace identification

Probing inputs for subspace identification

There is experimental evidence that the standard subspace methods (e.g. the N4SID method) perform poorly in certain conditions where the past signals (past inputs and past outputs) and future input spaces are nearly parallel. Based on an elementary numerical conditioning analysis, the paper describes a class of (system-dependent) input signals (called probing inputs) which lead to the worst possible conditioning of the identification problem. Numerical results are included demonstrating how these input signals may lead to a substantial deterioration of performance of the algorithms in some experimental conditions.

Alessandro Chiuso | Giorgio Picci

[1] B. Moor,et al. Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[2] Giorgio Picci,et al. Realization of stochastic systems with exogenous inputs and subspace identification methods , 1999, Autom..

[3] Anders Lindquist,et al. Canonical correlation analysis, approximate covariance extension, and identification of stationary time series , 1996, Autom..

[4] Bart De Moor,et al. N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems , 1994, Autom..

[5] B. Wahlberg,et al. Counterexample to General Consistency of Subspace System Identification Methods , 1997 .

[6] A. Chiuso,et al. Subspace identification by orthogonal decomposition , 1999 .

[7] Giorgio Picci,et al. Stochastic realization with exogenous inputs and 'subspace-methods' identification , 1996, Signal Process..

[8] W. Larimore. System Identification, Reduced-Order Filtering and Modeling via Canonical Variate Analysis , 1983, 1983 American Control Conference.

[9] Michel Verhaegen,et al. Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovations form from input-output data , 1994, Autom..