Mobile App Analytics: A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Choice Framework

The number of mobile apps launched in the market has exponentially grown to more than 2 million, but little is known about how users choose and consume apps of numerous categories. This study develops a utility theory-based structural model for mobile app analytics. We use the theoretical concepts of utility and satiation along with the factor analytic approach, as bases in simultaneously modeling the complex relationships among choice, consumption, and utility maximization for consumers of various mobile apps. Using a unique panel dataset detailing individual user-level mobile app time consumption, we quantify the baseline utility and satiation levels of diverse mobile apps and delineate how app preferences and consumption patterns vary across demographic groups and affected by persistent use and time trends. The findings suggest that users’ baseline utility substantially diverges across app categories and that their demographic characteristics and habit formation explain the appreciable heterogeneity in baseline utility and satiation. These parameters also exhibit positive and negative correlations in mobile websites and app categories. Our modeling approaches and computational methods can unlock new perspectives and opportunities for handling large-scale, micro-level data, while serving as important resources for big data analytics and mobile app analytics.

[1]  Peter J. Danaher,et al.  Optimal Internet Media Selection , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[2]  Sachin Gupta,et al.  Modeling Preferences for Common Attributes in Multicategory Brand Choice , 2005 .

[3]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Advertising Media Models: A Practical Guide , 1986 .

[4]  Michael Keane,et al.  Simulation estimation for panel data models with limited dependent variables , 1993 .

[5]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  I. Hendel,et al.  Estimating Multiple-Discrete Choice Models: An Application to Computeri-Zzation Returns , 1994 .

[7]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety , 2002 .

[8]  Roland T. Rust.  Selecting network television advertising schedules , 1985 .

[9]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction , 1994 .

[10]  Sanghak Lee,et al.  A Direct Utility Model for Asymmetric Complements , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How is the Mobile Internet Different? , 2012, ICIS.

[12]  John M. Olin,et al.  Modeling Multiple Sources of State Dependence in Random Utility Models: A Distributed Lag Approach , 2004 .

[13]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Counting Your Customers the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model , 2005 .

[14]  Chris Forman,et al.  News Media Channels: Complements or Substitutes? Evidence from Mobile Phone Usage , 2013, ICIS.

[15]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Heterogeneous Logit Model Implications for Brand Positioning , 1994 .

[16]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Can We Predict Customer Lifetime Value? Can We Predict Customer Lifetime Value , 2004 .

[17]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing , 1996 .

[18]  K. Axhausen,et al.  An analysis of weekly out-of-home discretionary activity participation and time-use behavior , 2009 .

[19]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  The Mixed-Media Dirichlet Multinomial Distribution: A Model for Evaluating Television-Magazine Advertising Schedules , 1984 .

[20]  L. Krishnamurthi,et al.  A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities , 1988 .

[21]  N BoltonRuth,et al.  A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer'S Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider , 1998 .

[22]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Understanding Store-Brand Purchase Behavior Across Categories , 2006 .

[23]  C. Bhat.  The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model : Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions , 2008 .

[24]  Neel Sundaresan,et al.  Growth, Adoption, and Use of Mobile E-Commerce , 2014 .

[25]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of Households , 1993 .

[26]  Sang Pil Han,et al.  Estimating Demand for Mobile Applications in the New Economy , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[29]  Tülin Erdem,et al.  Econometric modeling of competition: A multi-category choice-based mapping approach , 1998 .

[30]  M. Keane.  Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior , 1997 .

[31]  Octavian Carare,et al.  The Impact of Bestseller Rank on Demand: Evidence from the App Market , 2011 .

[32]  Brian T. Ratchford,et al.  Why We Do What We Do: A Model of Activity Consumption , 2012 .

[33]  Terry Elrod,et al.  A Factor-Analytic Probit Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data , 1995 .

[34]  Miklos Sarvary,et al.  Which Products Are Best Suited to Mobile Advertising? A Field Study of Mobile Display Advertising Effects on Consumer Attitudes and Intentions , 2014 .

[35]  Sang Pil Han,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of User Content Generation and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[37]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[38]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions , 2005 .

[39]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Customizing Promotions in Online Stores , 2004 .

[40]  Abel P. Jeuland,et al.  Brand Choice Inertia as One Aspect of the Notion of Brand Loyalty , 1979 .

[41]  Rahul Telang,et al.  Inferring App Demand from Publicly Available Data , 2013, MIS Q..