A New Approach for Assemblability Assessment Using Time and Postural Analysis - a Case Study

This paper explores a new approach to assess assemblability of manual assembly. Assessment of assembly is a prerequisite to optimize an assembly process. Traditionally assemblability is assessed by Design for Assembly (DFA) tools and Time motion studies. However, DFA tools do not usually take into account the in uence of human postures whereas time motion studies focus typically on bench work type of jobs. In order to assess the dif culty of a manual assembly process, we must take into account both the static aspects of the job (represented by dif culty of maintaining a posture) as well as its dynamic aspects (difficulties associated with moving from one posture to another). So, we propose a method that combines both time and postural analysis for the assessment of assemblability. The tool used for the static analysis is called Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA); for dynamic analysis we propose a method of time analysis that is based on a ratio of time spent in ne and gross motions carried out in an assembly process. The dif culty of assembly of a series of manual assembly tasks carried out in laboratory was assessed by this method and correlating the assessment with the feedback obtained from the subjects who carried out these assembly tasks. A video recording of the assembly tasks of a desktop personal computer frame assembly was used as the case study. The results show that there exists a signi cant correlation between the subject feed backs and the combined dif culty scores

[1]  Roland Örtengren,et al.  MTM-based ergonomic workload analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Anil Mital,et al.  Incorporating work factors in design for disassembly in product design , 2005 .

[3]  H. K. Rampersad The house of DFA , 1995, Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning.

[4]  R Feyen,et al.  Computer-aided ergonomics: a case study of incorporating ergonomics analyses into workplace design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  R. Levin,et al.  Applied Elementary Statistics , 1980 .

[6]  S Hignett,et al.  Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  J Atha,et al.  Current techniques for measuring motion. , 1984, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Roland Kadefors,et al.  Ergonomic evaluation of complex work: a participative approach employing video–computer interaction, exemplified in a study of order picking , 2000 .

[10]  W Karwowski,et al.  Postural stress analysis in industry. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors resulting from awkward postures of the legs, trunk and neck , 1992 .

[12]  Sai Cheong Fok,et al.  Integrated intelligent design and assembly planning: A survey , 1998 .

[13]  W Laurig,et al.  An approach to assessing motor workload in assembly tasks by the use of predetermined-motion-time systems. , 1985, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Sue Hignett,et al.  Rapid Entire Body Assessment , 2004 .

[15]  W Karwowski,et al.  LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Javier Santos,et al.  Using ergonomic software in non-repetitive manufacturing processes: A case study , 2007 .

[17]  Robert H. Sturges A quantification of manual dexterity: the design for an assembly calculator , 1989 .

[18]  F. Greco,et al.  Investigation of work-related disorders in truck drivers using RULA method. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.