A comparison of screening mammography results from programs for women of different socioeconomic status

The ability of screening mammography programs serving women of different socioeconomic status (SES) to diagnose early stage breast carcinoma in a comparably effective fashion has been questioned.

[1]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Comparison of the relative incidence of impalpable invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in cancers detected in patients older and younger than 50 years of age. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  K. Freund,et al.  Black Women Receive Less Mammography Even with Similar Use of Primary Care , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  P. Wingo,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1996 , 1996, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  D. Dershaw.  Mammographic Screening in Women 40 to 49 Years Old , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Mickey,et al.  Breast cancer screening and associated factors for low-income African-American women. , 1995, Preventive medicine.

[6]  Claire I. Viadro,et al.  The North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program: foundations and design of a model for reaching older, minority, rural women , 1995, Breast cancer research and treatment.

[7]  E A Sickles,et al.  Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. G. Curnen,et al.  Can mammography screening explain the race difference in stage at diagnosis of breast cancer? , 1995, Cancer.

[9]  S. True.  Community-based breast health partnerships. , 1995, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[10]  C. Mccoy,et al.  Breast cancer control program for the socioeconomically disadvantaged. Screening mammography for the poor , 1994, Cancer.

[11]  T. Hofer,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. , 1994, JAMA.

[12]  K. Smigel.  Survey shows: American women favor mammography. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  J. Horm,et al.  Stage at diagnosis in breast cancer: race and socioeconomic factors. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[14]  L. Liberman,et al.  Mobile mammographic screening of self-referred women: results of 22,540 screenings. , 1992, Radiology.

[15]  Robert A. Smith,et al.  Barriers to screening for breast cancer , 1992, Cancer.

[16]  C. Vanchieri.  New surveys show use of mammography rising. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  E A Sickles,et al.  Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. , 1990, Radiology.

[18]  T. Farley,et al.  Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[19]  R. Bird,et al.  Low-cost screening mammography: report on finances and review of 21,716 consecutive cases. , 1989, Radiology.

[20]  W. Hendee,et al.  Mammographic screening in women 40-49 years old. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  S. Feig,et al.  Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials. , 1988, Radiology.

[22]  J. Young,et al.  Cancer patient survival among ethnic groups in the United States. , 1984, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  D. R. Cooper,et al.  Cancer of the breast in philadelphia hospitals 1951‐1964 , 1969, Cancer.