Mapping Derivative Relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME 2

Abstract Semantic interoperability between Resource Description and Access (RDA) and BIBFRAME models is of great interest to the library community. In this context, this work investigates the mapping of core entities, inherent and derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME, and proposes mapping rules assessed using two gold datasets. Findings indicate that RDA core entities and inherent relationships can be successfully mapped to BIBFRAME using the bf:hasExpression property, while extending bf:hasExpression as transitive simplifies BIBFRAME representations. Moreover, mapping derivative relationships between RDA Expressions was successful with loss of specificity in non-translation cases. The mapping of derivative relationships between RDA Works produced “noisy” bf:hasDerivative occurrences in BIBFRAME.

[1]  Rachel Ivy Clarke.  Find, identify, select...socialize?: Alternative objectives of library catalogs , 2014, ASIST.

[2]  Barbara B. Tillett.  A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships , 1991 .

[3]  P SmiragliaRichard,et al.  Derivative bibliographic relationships , 1999 .

[4]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Presenting bibliographic families: Designing an FRBR-based prototype using information visualization , 2016, J. Documentation.

[5]  Richard P. Smiraglia.  Derivative Bibliographic Relationships among Theological Works. , 1999 .

[6]  Barbara B. Tillett,et al.  A Virtual International Authority File. , 2001 .

[7]  Richard P. Smiraglia,et al.  Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: The Work Relationship in a Global Bibliographic Database , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Athena Salaba,et al.  SOLID FOUNDATIONS AND SOME SECONDARY ASSUMPTIONS IN THE DESIGN OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC METADATA: TOWARD A TYPOLOGY OF COMPLEMENTARY USES OF METADATA , 2017 .

[9]  Concepción Rodríguez Parada.  BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació , 2001 .

[10]  Michalis Sfakakis,et al.  Assessing the Preservation of Derivative Relationships in Mappings from FRBR to BIBFRAME , 2018, MTSR.

[11]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Presenting bibliographic families using information visualization: Evaluation of FRBR‐based prototype and hierarchical visualizations , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Lyn Condron,et al.  Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records , 2004 .

[13]  B. Tillet.  Bibliographic relationships : toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging , 1987 .

[14]  Lisa Romano,et al.  Bibliographic framework initiative , 2018 .

[15]  Michalis Sfakakis,et al.  Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the Semantic Web: A comparison of four conceptual models , 2017, J. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Sherry Lynn Vellucci.  Bibliographic relationships among musical bibliographic entities : a conceptual analysis of music represented in a library catalog with a taxonomy of the relationships discovered , 1995 .

[17]  Shoichi Taniguchi.  Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the Viewpoint of RDA Metadata Schema , 2017 .

[18]  Marija Petek.  Derivative bibliographic relationships in the Slovenian online catalogue COBIB , 2007, J. Documentation.

[19]  Shoichi Taniguchi.  Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: Does RDA Represent a Different Conceptual Model? , 2012 .

[20]  Richard P. Smiraglia.  Authority Control of Works: Cataloging's Chimera? , 2004 .

[21]  Philip Schreur.  The Evolution of BIBFRAME: from MARC Surrogate to Web Conformant Data Model , 2017 .