A model for unsteady state drainage of a static foam

Abstract A model for the unsteady state drainage of a standing foam has been proposed. This model accounted for (i) the liquid drainage from plateau borders due to gravity as well as the gradient of plateau border suction and (ii) the movement of the foam-liquid interface due to the accumulation of drained liquid, and assumed that the foam bed consisted of dodecahedral bubbles of the same size. The simplifying assumption of a negligible fraction of liquid in thin films, employed in the present model, was justified through the comparison of the timescales of film and plateau border drainage. Typical evolutions of a liquid holdup profile as well as a foam-liquid interface are reported for foam generated by bubbling inert gas through a liquid pool at a constant gas flow rate in the form of bubbles of the same size. The predicted equilibrium liquid holdup profile has been shown to depend only on the density difference, bubble size and surface tension but not on viscosity and surface viscosity, and compared well with experimental data. Asymptotic expression for the equilibrium disjoining pressure indicated that larger density difference, larger bubble sizes and smaller surface tensions would tend to make the standing foam less stable.

[1]  Robert S. Schechter,et al.  The stability of foams: Dependence of observation on the bubble size distribution , 1984 .

[2]  Robert Lemlich,et al.  A study of interstitial liquid flow in foam. Part I. Theoretical model and application to foam fractionation , 1965 .

[3]  P. A. Haas,et al.  A Model and Experimental Results for Drainage of Solution between Foam Bubbles , 1967 .

[4]  P. Walstra,et al.  Protein‐stabilized foams and emulsions , 1981 .

[5]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Hydrodynamics, enrichment, and collapse in foams , 1986 .

[6]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Effect of bubble size distribution on the enrichment and collapse in foams , 1986 .

[7]  H. M. Princen,et al.  Osmotic pressure of foams and highly concentrated emulsions. 2. Determination from the variation in volume fraction with height in an equilibrated column , 1987 .

[8]  H. M. Princen Osmotic pressure of foams and highly concentrated emulsions. I. Theoretical considerations , 1986 .

[9]  R. Lemlich Prediction of Changes in Bubble Size Distribution Due to Interbubble Gas Diffusion in Foam , 1978 .

[10]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Hydrodynamics of thin liquid films , 1974 .

[11]  R. K. Jain,et al.  Instability and rupture of thin liquid films , 1979 .

[12]  K. Khilar,et al.  Enhancement of stability of aqueous foams by addition of water-soluble polymers—measurements and analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Rajinder Kumar,et al.  Flow through a plateau border of cellular foam , 1982 .

[14]  S. Ross,et al.  A new method and apparatus for measuring foam stability , 1981 .

[15]  C. S. Grove,et al.  Theoretical Investigation of Foam Drainage , 1956 .

[16]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Liquid holdup in semi-batch cellular foams , 1983 .

[17]  D. Shah,et al.  The influence of temperature on surface and microscopic properties of surfactant solutions in relation to fluid displacement efficiency in porous media , 1985 .

[18]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Hydrodynamics of thin liquid films , 1974 .

[19]  Andrew M. Kraynik,et al.  Drainage of Aqueous Foams: Generation-Pressure and Cell-Size Effects , 1983 .

[20]  E. Manev,et al.  Critical thickness of thin liquid films: Theory and experiment , 1983 .