Digital Image DNA Cytometry: A Useful Tool for the Evaluation of Malignancy in Biliary Strictures

Background: Cytologic evaluation of the biliary tract strictures is nowadays widely used for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions but remains a challenge for some problematic cases. Digital Image cytometry (DNA-cytometry) helps cytopathologists to resolve some unclear situations. Methods: We have analysed 41 specimens of bile duct brushings obtained from patients during ERCP (11 benign cases, 7 suspicious for malignancy cases and 23 malignant cases) by DNA-cytometry and correlated them with the histological biopsy counterpart. Results: All eleven cytological and histological benign cases were DNA-diploid and among 22 patients with malignant cytological and histological diagnosis 21 were DNA-aneuploid. One case considered malignant by the cytopathologist revealed DNA-aneuploid but malignancy could not be confirmed by histology. The analysis of the suspicious for malignancy cases revealed that all DNA-aneuploid cases were malignant and all DNA-diploid cases were benign referring to the follow-up of the patients. The comparison between cytology alone and cytology combined with DNA-cytometry related to the histological diagnosis (gold standard) resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 79% for cytology alone; a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity 92% for DNA-cytometry and a specificity of 93% and a sensitivity of 100% with combined analyses. The positive predictive value was 90% for cytology, 96% for DNA-cytometry and for both analyses. The negative predictive value showed 100% for cytology, 89% for DNA-cytometry and 100% for combined studies. Conclusions: Despite the limited number of patients involved in the study, the Results obtained indicate an increased of specificity and of positive predictive value using DNA-cytometry. These Results confirm the pertinence of these method for challenging cases, in conjunction with other available diagnostic tools.

[1]  C. Dunkley,et al.  Improving diagnostic yield of biliary brushings cytology for pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma , 2004, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[2]  S. Selvaggi Biliary brushing cytology , 2004, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[3]  L. Ylagan,et al.  Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: Retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep® techniques , 2003, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[4]  A. Bergquist,et al.  Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. , 2002, Endoscopy.

[5]  W. Silverman,et al.  Detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  V. Reddy,et al.  Brush cytology of the biliary tract: Retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation , 2002, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[7]  S. Krishnamurthy,et al.  DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing , 2001, Cancer.

[8]  R. Carter,et al.  Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico–biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases , 2001, Journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  G. Haroske,et al.  Fourth Updated ESACP Consensus Report on Diagnostic DNA Image Cytometry , 2001, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[10]  T. Therneau,et al.  Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis. , 2001, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  A. Bergquist,et al.  Can DNA cytometry be used for evaluation of malignancy and premalignancy in bile duct strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis? , 2000, Journal of hepatology.

[12]  C. Stewart,et al.  Value of p53 immunostaining in pancreatico‐biliary brush cytology specimens , 2000, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[13]  S. Hajdu,et al.  Biliary Tract Brush Cytology , 2000, Acta Cytologica.

[14]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Bladder Transitional Cell Carcinomas: A Comparative Study of Washing and Tumor Bioptic Samples by DNA Flow Cytometry and FISH Analyses , 2000, European Urology.

[15]  C. Park,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for malignancy in bile cytology and its usefulness. , 1999, Journal of Korean medical science.

[16]  K. Khurana,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures. , 1999, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  A. Stiehl,et al.  Value of Brush Border Cytology for Dominant Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis , 1999, Endoscopy.

[18]  N. Friedrichs,et al.  Immunocytochemistry and DNA-image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology. II. Diagnostic Accuracy in Equivocal Smears , 1999, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[19]  G. Tytgat,et al.  Value of brush cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis , 1998, Endoscopy.

[20]  J. Burdick,et al.  In situ hybridization for telomerase RNA in routine cytologic brushings for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies. , 1998, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[21]  C Decaestecker,et al.  Image cytometry as a discriminatory tool for cytologic specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography , 1998, Cancer.

[22]  A. Cavaliere,et al.  DNA-ploidy studies on cytological preparations from breast cancers by image analysis: comparison with Feulgen staining performed in destained Papanicolaou slides. , 1996, Cytometry.

[23]  D. Johnston,et al.  DNA content by image analysis. An accurate discriminator of malignancy in pericardial effusions. , 1994, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[24]  M. E. Ryan,et al.  Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[25]  R. Kiss,et al.  Use of cell image analysis in the detection of cancer from specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. , 1993, American journal of clinical pathology.

[26]  J W Bacus,et al.  Comparison of the Papanicolaou and Feulgen staining methods for DNA quantification by image analysis. , 1990, Cytometry.

[27]  I W Taylor,et al.  Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. , 1983, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.