Evaluation of the lower incisor inclination during alignment and leveling using superelastic NiTi archwires: a laboratory study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this laboratory study is to evaluate the influence of the shape and the length limitation of superelastic nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires on lower incisors inclination during alignment and leveling. METHODS: Metal teeth mounted on a typodont articulator device were used to simulate a malocclusion of the mandibular arch (-3.5 mm model discrepancy). Three different shapes (Standard, Accuform and Ideal) of superelastic NiTi archwires (Sentalloy, GAC, USA) were tested. Specimens were divided in two groups: Group I, with no limitation of the archwire length; and Group II, with distal limitation. Each group had thirty specimens divided into three subgroups differentiated by the archwire shape. All groups used round wires with diameters of 0.014-in, 0.016-in, 0.018-in and 0.020-in. The recording of all intervals was accomplished using standardized digital photographs with orthogonal norm in relation to median sagittal plane. The buccolingual inclination of the incisor was registered using photographs and software CorelDraw. RESULTS: The results were obtained using ANOVA and Tukey's test at a significant level of 5%. The inclination of the lower incisor increased in both groups and subgroups. The shape of the archwire had statistically significant influence only in Group I - Standard (11.76o), Ideal (5.88o) and Accuform (1.93o). Analyzing the influence of the length limitation, despite the mean incisor tipping in Group II (3.91o) had been smaller than Group I (6.52o), no statistically significant difference was found, except for Standard, 3.89o with limitation and 11.76o without limitation. The greatest incisor tipping occurred with the 0.014-in archwires.

[1]  N. Pandis,et al.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  E. Zenóbio,et al.  Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  B. Melsen,et al.  Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  Hakan El,et al.  Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment and retention with a new computerized method. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  J. Powers,et al.  Force-deflection comparison of superelastic nickel-titanium archwires. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  A. Jacobson Does labial movement of lower incisors influence the level of the gingival margin? A case-control study of adult orthodontic patients , 2004 .

[7]  R. Nanda,et al.  Stability of transverse expansion in the mandibular arch. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  C. Hayes,et al.  Correlation between mandibular central incisor proclination and gingival recession during fixed appliance therapy. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  H Noroozi,et al.  The dental arch form revisited. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  J. Årtun,et al.  Periodontal status of mandibular incisors after pronounced orthodontic advancement during adolescence: a follow-up evaluation. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  W. Hnat,et al.  An evaluation of the shape of some popular nickel titanium alloy preformed arch wires. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  E. F. Harris,et al.  Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. , 1998, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession? , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  R. M. Little,et al.  Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  R. M. Little,et al.  Stability of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination: a study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  R. M. Little,et al.  Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  R. M. Little,et al.  An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  R. M. Little,et al.  Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[19]  R. Walters,et al.  The mandibular dental arch: Part I, lower incisor position. , 1977, The Angle orthodontist.

[20]  Gardner Sd,et al.  Posttreatment and postretention changes following orthodontic therapy. , 1976 .

[21]  P. Shapiro,et al.  Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Treatment and postretention changes. , 1974, American journal of orthodontics.