Will technological innovation create the true lifetime home?

This paper discusses the relationship between different forms of design and technological innovation and their ability to support older people in their own homes. It considers (1) innovation in the design and construction of new housing, notably ‘lifetime homes’ and ‘open building’ systems; (2) the introduction of electronically enhanced assistive technology; and (3) telecare. Each of these is examined in terms of its potential benefits for meeting the housing needs of older people and its limitations. The paper proposes that these innovations are likely to have a variable effect on the possible housing pathways of older people, depending on the way they are combined. It also outlines the policy and market influences that may stimulate their adoption, concluding that design and technology innovations must be matched by new care delivery models.

[1]  Claire L. Jarvis.  Getting around after 60 : a profile of Britain's older population , 1996 .

[2]  Agneta Ståhl,et al.  The Personal Component of Accessibility at Group Level: Exploring the Complexity of Functional Capacity , 2002 .

[3]  B. Johansson,et al.  The disablement process in very late life: a study of the oldest-old in Sweden. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[4]  James Barlow,et al.  Organizational complexity or technological complexity? Explaining telecare implementation , 2004 .

[5]  C RAYNER,et al.  Designing for the disabled. , 1962, Medical world.

[6]  Caitriona Carroll,et al.  Meeting Part M and Designing Lifetime Homes , 1999 .

[7]  Frances Heywood,et al.  Adaptation: Altering the House to Restore the Home , 2005 .

[8]  M. Ball.  Housing and construction: A troubled relationship? , 1996 .

[9]  Rex Taylor,et al.  Lifestyle and Ageing , 1981, Ageing and Society.

[10]  James Barlow,et al.  Land for Housing: Current Practice and Future Options , 2002 .

[11]  Kenneth Powell,et al.  The new office , 1997 .

[12]  L. Pickard.  The decline of intensive intergenerational care of older people in Great Britain, 1985-1995. , 2002, Population trends.

[13]  Adelina Comas-Herrera,et al.  Relying on informal care in the new century? Informal care for elderly people in England to 2031 , 2000, Ageing and Society.

[14]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Housing Quality and the Provision of Accessible Homes , 2003 .

[15]  D. Galinsky,et al.  Characterization of elderly patients in rehabilitation: stroke versus hip fracture. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built , 1997 .

[17]  N. J. Habraken,et al.  Supports, an alternative to mass housing , 1972 .

[18]  J. Forder,et al.  Social Care Markets: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[19]  Michael Ball,et al.  Introduction-Improving British Housing Supply , 1999 .

[20]  Ruth Madigan,et al.  The politics of accessible housing in the UK , 2001 .

[21]  S. Brownsell,et al.  An attributable cost model for a telecare system using advanced community alarms , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.