A trade-off in task allocation between sensitivity to the environment and response time.

Task allocation is the process that adjusts the number of workers in each colony task in response to the environment. There is no central coordination of task allocation; instead workers use local cues from the environment and from other workers to decide which task to perform. We examine two aspects of task allocation: the sensitivity to the environment of task distribution, and the rate of response to environmental changes. We investigate how these two aspects are influenced by: (1) colony size, and (2) behavioral rules used by workers, i.e. how a worker uses cues from the environment and from social interactions with other workers in deciding which task to perform. We show that if workers use social cues in their choice of task, response time decreases with increasing colony size. Sensitivity of task distribution to the environment may decrease or not with colony size, depending on the behavioral rules used by workers. This produces a trade-off in task allocation: short response times can be achieved by increasing colony size, but at the cost of decreased sensitivity to the environment. We show that when a worker's response to social interactions depends on the local environment, sensitivity of task distribution to the environment is not affected by colony size and the trade-off is avoided.

[1]  C Bernstein,et al.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Group and mass recruitment in ant colonies: the influence of contact rates , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insects , 1999, Birkhäuser Basel.

[7]  J. Pickering,et al.  Cooperative foraging, productivity, and the central limit theorem. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: Experimental) , 1993 .

[9]  D. Gordon The Organization of Work in Social Insect , 2003 .

[10]  D. Gordon,et al.  What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. I. Effect of Colony Size on Queueing Delay and Colony Ergonomic Efficiency , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[12]  B. Goodwin,et al.  A Parallel Distributed Model of the Behaviour of Ant Colonies , 1992 .

[13]  Bourke Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects , 1999 .

[14]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal foraging and learning , 1985 .

[15]  Guy Sella,et al.  The Computationally Complete Ant Colony: Global Coordination in a System with No Hierarchy , 1995, ECAL.

[16]  Chris Tofts Algorithms for task allocation in ants. (A study of temporal polyethism: Theory) , 1993 .

[17]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective patterns and decision-making , 1989 .

[18]  I. Karsai,et al.  Productivity, individual-level and colony-level flexibility, and organization of work as consequences of colony size. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Holway,et al.  COMPETITIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DISPLACEMENT OF NATIVE ANTS BY THE INVASIVE ARGENTINE ANT , 1999 .

[20]  R. Jeanne Group size, productivity, and information flow in social wasps , 1999 .

[21]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy , 1989 .

[22]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies. I. Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources , 1987 .

[23]  D. Gordon The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[24]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Ants at Work - How an Insect Society Is Organized , 1999 .

[26]  E. Pianka,et al.  Animal foraging: past, present and future. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[28]  S. Fretwell Populations in a seasonal environment. , 1973, Monographs in population biology.

[29]  L. Keller Social evolution in ants , 1996 .

[30]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Group-level dynamics in harvester ants: young colonies and the role of patrolling , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  From individual to collective behavior in social insects , 1987 .

[32]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .

[33]  A. Houston,et al.  Models of adaptive behaviour , 1999 .